COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE

The energy use that is in excess of practicum students’ needs and the disturbed comfort that the practicum students experience when conducting practicums in the Electrical eengineering vocational education (EEVE) laboratory. The main objective in this study was to figure out how to predict and s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Desmira, Desmira, Abu Bakar, Norazhar, Wiryadinata, Romi, Abi Hamid, Mustofa, Kholifah, Nur, Nurtanto, Muhammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2022
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/2/0181919092023360.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/
https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/27111
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.utem.eprints.27041
record_format eprints
spelling my.utem.eprints.270412023-12-15T08:35:11Z http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/ COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE Desmira, Desmira Abu Bakar, Norazhar Wiryadinata, Romi Abi Hamid, Mustofa Kholifah, Nur Nurtanto, Muhammad The energy use that is in excess of practicum students’ needs and the disturbed comfort that the practicum students experience when conducting practicums in the Electrical eengineering vocational education (EEVE) laboratory. The main objective in this study was to figure out how to predict and streamline the use of electrical energy in the EEVE laboratory. The model used to achieve this research’s goal was called the adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model, which was coupled with principal component analysis (PCA) feature selection. The use of PCA in data grouping performance aims to improve the performance of the ANFIS model when predicting energy needs in accordance with the standards set by the campus while still taking students’ confidence in conducting practicum activities during campus operating hours into consideration. After some experiments and tests, very good results were obtained in the training: R=1 in training; minimum RMSE=0.011900; epoch of 100 per iteration; and R=0.37522. In conclusion, the ANFIS model coupled with PCA feature selection was excellent at predicting energy needs in the laboratory while the comfort of the students during practicums in the room remained within consideration. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2022-08 Article PeerReviewed text en http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/2/0181919092023360.PDF Desmira, Desmira and Abu Bakar, Norazhar and Wiryadinata, Romi and Abi Hamid, Mustofa and Kholifah, Nur and Nurtanto, Muhammad (2022) COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 27 (2). pp. 970-979. ISSN 2502-4752 https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/27111 10.11591/ijeecs.v27.i2.pp970-979
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
building UTEM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
content_source UTEM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.utem.edu.my/
language English
description The energy use that is in excess of practicum students’ needs and the disturbed comfort that the practicum students experience when conducting practicums in the Electrical eengineering vocational education (EEVE) laboratory. The main objective in this study was to figure out how to predict and streamline the use of electrical energy in the EEVE laboratory. The model used to achieve this research’s goal was called the adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model, which was coupled with principal component analysis (PCA) feature selection. The use of PCA in data grouping performance aims to improve the performance of the ANFIS model when predicting energy needs in accordance with the standards set by the campus while still taking students’ confidence in conducting practicum activities during campus operating hours into consideration. After some experiments and tests, very good results were obtained in the training: R=1 in training; minimum RMSE=0.011900; epoch of 100 per iteration; and R=0.37522. In conclusion, the ANFIS model coupled with PCA feature selection was excellent at predicting energy needs in the laboratory while the comfort of the students during practicums in the room remained within consideration.
format Article
author Desmira, Desmira
Abu Bakar, Norazhar
Wiryadinata, Romi
Abi Hamid, Mustofa
Kholifah, Nur
Nurtanto, Muhammad
spellingShingle Desmira, Desmira
Abu Bakar, Norazhar
Wiryadinata, Romi
Abi Hamid, Mustofa
Kholifah, Nur
Nurtanto, Muhammad
COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
author_facet Desmira, Desmira
Abu Bakar, Norazhar
Wiryadinata, Romi
Abi Hamid, Mustofa
Kholifah, Nur
Nurtanto, Muhammad
author_sort Desmira, Desmira
title COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
title_short COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
title_full COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND ANFIS TO IMPROVE EEVE LABORATORY ENERGY USE PREDICTION PERFORMANCE
title_sort comparison of principal component analysis and anfis to improve eeve laboratory energy use prediction performance
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
publishDate 2022
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/2/0181919092023360.PDF
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/27041/
https://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS/article/view/27111
_version_ 1787140269012942848
score 13.211869