Effect Of Quadruple P-Spiral Split Ring Resonator (QPS-SRR) Structure On Microstrip Patch Antenna Design

In this project, the different locations of the quadruple P-spiral split ring resonator (MI-SRR) structure are embedded in the basic rectangular patch antenna. It started with a basic rectangular microstrip patch antenna that simulated in CST Microwave Studio software. After that, four different loc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hassan, Nornikman, Abd. Aziz, Mohamad Zoinol Abidin, Noor Azizi, Muhammad Syafiq, Ramli, Mohamad Hafize, Othman, Mohd Azlishah, Sulaiman, Hamzah Asyrani, Ahmad, Badrul Hisham, Sulaiman, Mohd Hafiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2016
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/17746/1/Effect%20Of%20Quadruple%20P-Spiral%20Split%20Ring%20Resonator%20%28QPS-SRR%29%20Structure%20On%20Microstrip%20Patch%20Antenna%20Design.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/17746/
https://journals.utm.my/jurnalteknologi/article/view/8628/5135
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8628
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this project, the different locations of the quadruple P-spiral split ring resonator (MI-SRR) structure are embedded in the basic rectangular patch antenna. It started with a basic rectangular microstrip patch antenna that simulated in CST Microwave Studio software. After that, four different locations (Location A, Location B, Location C and Location D) of QPS-SRR had chosen to compare its performance of return loss, resonant frequency, surface current radiation pattern, and gain. Location A is representing the antenna with the QPS-SRR at the center part of the patch while Location B has the QPS-SRR at the upper part of the FR-4 substrate. For the Location C and Location D represent the antenna with MI-SRR at the ground at antenna with MI-SRR at the other layer, respectively. Compared with the basic rectangular antenna with only – 27.082 dB, the best return loss was reached by Location A with - 34.199 dB with resonant frequency at 2.390 GHz, while the Location C only shifted the minor value to 2.394 GHz with only - 25.13 dB.