Managing Software Project Risks (Design Phase) with Proposed Fuzzy Regression Analysis Techniques With Fuzzy Concepts
Abstract - This Regardless how much effort we put for the success of sofnvare projects, many sofnvare projects have very high failure rate. Risk is not always avoidable, but it is controllable. The aim of this paper is to present the new mining technique that uses the fuzzy multiple regression an...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11782/1/Managing_Software_Project_Risks_%28Design_Phase%29_with_Proposed_Fuzzy_Regression_Analysis_Techniques_With_Fuzzy_Concepts.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/11782/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract - This Regardless how much effort we put for the success of sofnvare projects, many
sofnvare projects have very high failure rate. Risk is not always avoidable, but it is controllable.
The aim of this paper is to present the new mining technique that uses the fuzzy multiple
regression analysis techniques with fuzzy concepts to managing the risks in a software project and
reducing risk with sofnvare process improvement. Top ten sofnvare risk factors in design phase
and thirty risk management techniques were presented to respondents. Tire results show that alf
risks in sofnvare projects were important in sofnvare project manager perspective. whereas all
risk management techniques are used most of time. and often. However, these mining tests were
perfonned using fuzzy multiple regression analysis techniques to compare tire risk management
techniques to each of the software risk factors to determine if they are effective in mitigating the
occurrence of each sofnvare risk factor by usjng statistical package for the Social Science (SPSS)
for Manipulating and analyzing tire data set, MAT LAB 7.12.0 (R20 11 a), wolfram mathematic 9. 0,.
Also ten top software risk factors were mitigated by using risk management techniques except Risk
3 "Developing the Wrong User Interface". We referred the risk management techniques were
mitigated on sofnvare risk factors in Table XV. The study has been conducted on a group of
software project managers. Successful project risk management will greatly improve the |
|---|