The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer

Purpose: To identify the effect of dose calculation algorithms on the Normal Tissue Complication Probability values of thoracic cancer. Materials and Methods: NTCP values from BIOPLAN software is calculated based on standard DVH data. Dose distributions of treatment plans are calculated by usin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad, Noor Ashikin
Format: Monograph
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/57934/1/NOOR%20ASHIKIN%20BINTI%20AHMAD-24%20pages.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/57934/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usm.eprints.57934
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.57934 http://eprints.usm.my/57934/ The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer Ahmad, Noor Ashikin RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) Purpose: To identify the effect of dose calculation algorithms on the Normal Tissue Complication Probability values of thoracic cancer. Materials and Methods: NTCP values from BIOPLAN software is calculated based on standard DVH data. Dose distributions of treatment plans are calculated by using two different algorithms of Oncentra Masterplan (OMP) treatment planning system (TPS) which are Collapse Cone and Pencil Beam. Four treatment plans are created and DVHs are evaluated based on criteria of acceptance level. NTCP values for thorax plan one and two are evaluated by using different algorithm. Results: The coverage of the target volume for all treatment plans has achieved the desired isodose for at least 90% of isodose at 1 00% of volume. Collapsed cone shows better calculation in three beam but pencil beam is better in 5 beams calculation. The NTCP values of the LKB model are slightly higher than RS model for both cases even though using different kind of algorithm. Conclusions: There is no difference between pencil beam and collapsed cone algorithms in term of NTCP values. NTCP values are due to physical and biological effects. Mathematically, both treatment plans have higher probability to develop the complication but the numbers in this paper are not wholly based on clinical or even experimental data. It may due to patient-related factors, patient history or the modalities used in treatment delivery. Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2015-06 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/57934/1/NOOR%20ASHIKIN%20BINTI%20AHMAD-24%20pages.pdf Ahmad, Noor Ashikin (2015) The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer. Project Report. Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia. (Submitted)
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
spellingShingle RC254-282 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer)
Ahmad, Noor Ashikin
The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
description Purpose: To identify the effect of dose calculation algorithms on the Normal Tissue Complication Probability values of thoracic cancer. Materials and Methods: NTCP values from BIOPLAN software is calculated based on standard DVH data. Dose distributions of treatment plans are calculated by using two different algorithms of Oncentra Masterplan (OMP) treatment planning system (TPS) which are Collapse Cone and Pencil Beam. Four treatment plans are created and DVHs are evaluated based on criteria of acceptance level. NTCP values for thorax plan one and two are evaluated by using different algorithm. Results: The coverage of the target volume for all treatment plans has achieved the desired isodose for at least 90% of isodose at 1 00% of volume. Collapsed cone shows better calculation in three beam but pencil beam is better in 5 beams calculation. The NTCP values of the LKB model are slightly higher than RS model for both cases even though using different kind of algorithm. Conclusions: There is no difference between pencil beam and collapsed cone algorithms in term of NTCP values. NTCP values are due to physical and biological effects. Mathematically, both treatment plans have higher probability to develop the complication but the numbers in this paper are not wholly based on clinical or even experimental data. It may due to patient-related factors, patient history or the modalities used in treatment delivery.
format Monograph
author Ahmad, Noor Ashikin
author_facet Ahmad, Noor Ashikin
author_sort Ahmad, Noor Ashikin
title The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
title_short The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
title_full The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
title_fullStr The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
title_full_unstemmed The effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
title_sort effect of dose calculation algorithms on the normal tissue complication probability values of thoracic cancer
publisher Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.usm.my/57934/1/NOOR%20ASHIKIN%20BINTI%20AHMAD-24%20pages.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/57934/
_version_ 1762962385035853824
score 13.188475