Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software

This study determines the suitability of ImaSim CT simulation software, as CT Image generation and analysis. CT images of various tissues are obtained by using conventional CT and the CT simulation software. The value of CT number of various tissues which represents the tissue's density is c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus
Format: Monograph
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/57916/1/MUHAMMAD%20FIRDAUS%20BIN%20BAHARUDIN-24%20pages.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/57916/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usm.eprints.57916
record_format eprints
spelling my.usm.eprints.57916 http://eprints.usm.my/57916/ Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus QA75-76.95 Calculating Machines This study determines the suitability of ImaSim CT simulation software, as CT Image generation and analysis. CT images of various tissues are obtained by using conventional CT and the CT simulation software. The value of CT number of various tissues which represents the tissue's density is compared between conventional CT method and ImaSim software. To obtain the CT image conventionally, CIRS 062 Electron Density CT Phantom was used and 5 plug phantoms were used which are air, lung exhale, adipose, water and dense bone (1000 mglcc HA). The same types of tissues were used to simulate in the CT simulation software ImaSim and all the CT numbers were recorded. Both conventional and simulation method uses fixed tube current-time product at 260 mAs at three different energy which are 80 kVp, 120 kVp and 140 kVp. The value of CT number obtained for conventional CT and ImaSim software is in the acceptable range of CT numbers of each specific tissues. The chi-square calculated gives low value for air, fat and water which is less than 2.98. Chi-square value for lung and bone gives high value which is up to 200. Therefore the accuracy of CT number obtained from ImaSim software specifically for lung and bone is questionable as the value is deviated from the standard value and the CT number obtained conventionally. Pusat Pengajian Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2015 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/57916/1/MUHAMMAD%20FIRDAUS%20BIN%20BAHARUDIN-24%20pages.pdf Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus (2015) Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software. Project Report. Pusat Pengajian Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia. (Submitted)
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
building Hamzah Sendut Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Sains Malaysia
content_source USM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.usm.my/
language English
topic QA75-76.95 Calculating Machines
spellingShingle QA75-76.95 Calculating Machines
Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus
Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
description This study determines the suitability of ImaSim CT simulation software, as CT Image generation and analysis. CT images of various tissues are obtained by using conventional CT and the CT simulation software. The value of CT number of various tissues which represents the tissue's density is compared between conventional CT method and ImaSim software. To obtain the CT image conventionally, CIRS 062 Electron Density CT Phantom was used and 5 plug phantoms were used which are air, lung exhale, adipose, water and dense bone (1000 mglcc HA). The same types of tissues were used to simulate in the CT simulation software ImaSim and all the CT numbers were recorded. Both conventional and simulation method uses fixed tube current-time product at 260 mAs at three different energy which are 80 kVp, 120 kVp and 140 kVp. The value of CT number obtained for conventional CT and ImaSim software is in the acceptable range of CT numbers of each specific tissues. The chi-square calculated gives low value for air, fat and water which is less than 2.98. Chi-square value for lung and bone gives high value which is up to 200. Therefore the accuracy of CT number obtained from ImaSim software specifically for lung and bone is questionable as the value is deviated from the standard value and the CT number obtained conventionally.
format Monograph
author Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus
author_facet Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus
author_sort Baharudin, Muhammad Firdaus
title Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
title_short Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
title_full Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
title_fullStr Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CT number between conventional CT and ImaSim software
title_sort comparison of ct number between conventional ct and imasim software
publisher Pusat Pengajian Sains Kesihatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.usm.my/57916/1/MUHAMMAD%20FIRDAUS%20BIN%20BAHARUDIN-24%20pages.pdf
http://eprints.usm.my/57916/
_version_ 1762962384610131968
score 13.160551