Cost Comparison Of Seismic Design For Reinforced Concrete Building Under Ranau Earthquake
Active plate boundaries can cause an earthquake to its nearest location including Malaysia. On 5th June 2015, an earthquake has occurred at Ranau, Sabah with magnitude of 6.0 Richter scale. Serious damages on certain building had occurred by the impact of this earthquake. Thus, structural enginee...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Monograph |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universiti Sains Malaysia
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/51966/1/Cost%20Comparison%20Of%20Seismic%20Design%20For%20Reinforced%20Concrete%20Building%20Under%20Ranau%20Earthquake_Nor%20Amelia%20Adha_A9_2017.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/51966/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Active plate boundaries can cause an earthquake to its nearest location including
Malaysia. On 5th June 2015, an earthquake has occurred at Ranau, Sabah with
magnitude of 6.0 Richter scale. Serious damages on certain building had occurred by
the impact of this earthquake. Thus, structural engineers need solution to overcome this
problem from happening again. The cost estimate for superstructure under seismic
loading is important for engineers to analyze and have a better understanding on
costing. Therefore, the cost estimation is important for Malaysia as preliminary
information for construction player in preparation of the launch of Malaysia Annex to
Standard Malaysia. This study focuses on comparison of cost between seismic and
non-seismic design for three, six and nine storey with regular and irregular buildings.
The analyses were carried out by using SAP 2000 software and calculated the beam
and column design based on Eurocode 2. Results show that seismic design building has
the higher cost in steel tonnage and concrete volume compared to the non-seismic
design. The total cost of three storey under seismic design for regular building is 7.9 %
higher compared to the non-seismic design building. The total cost of three storey
under seismic design for irregular building is 21.9 % higher compared to the nonseismic
design building. Next, the total cost of six storey under seismic design for
regular building is 43.2 % higher compared to the non-seismic design building. The
total cost of six storey under seismic design for irregular building is 46.9 % higher
compared to the non-seismic design building. Besides that, the total cost of nine storey
under seismic design for regular building is 13.1 % higher compared to the non-seismic
design building. The total cost of nine storey under seismic design for irregular
building is 43.2 % higher compared to the non-seismic design building. |
---|