Capital Structure Determinants: Evidence From Surviving Listed Companies In Malaysia
This study examined the relationship between the determinants of capital structure and financial leverage of the surviving listed family and surviving non-family ownership of public listed companies in Malaysia. There are 474 publicly listed companies in the the Bursa Malaysia as at 31 December 1...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/47539/1/LAU%20TEIK%20CHENG%20-%20M.A.%202018%20CAPITAL%20STRUCTURE%20DETERMINANTS%20EVIDENCE%20FROM%20SURVIVING%20LISTED%20COMPANIES%20IN%20MALAYSIA.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/47539/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This study examined the relationship between the determinants of capital
structure and financial leverage of the surviving listed family and surviving non-family
ownership of public listed companies in Malaysia. There are 474 publicly listed
companies in the the Bursa Malaysia as at 31 December 1999, a longitudinal period of
study was examined from year 2000 to 2015, total 16 years. After deducted finance
related companies, those fall in PN4, PN17, delisted, non-survived and incomplete
data, final samples are 151 surviving listed companies, consist of 72 surviving family
and 79 surviving non-family listed companies. The econometric techniques, Pearson
correlation matrix, panel data analysis (fixed effects model) and independent samples
t-test have been applied. Financial accounting data as secondary data were derived
from Datastream and annual report. This study applied four independent variables,
namely asset tangibility (TANG), growth opportunities (GROWTH), profitability
(PROF) and liquidity (LIQ), and one control variable firm size (SIZE). The short term
debt ratio (STDR), long term debt ratio (LTDR) and debt ratio (DR) are dependent
variables. The average mean value of leverages for the surviving family firms are
slightly lower than surviving non-family firms, indicating that surviving family firms
use lower debt as comparison. Based on the mean value statistic, it reported that
surviving non-family companies perform slightly better than surviving family
companies in term of asset tangibility, growth opportunities and profitability.
However, surviving family companies’ liquidity and firm size are slightly larger than
non-family companies. |
|---|