Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision
In determining the acquisition decision of the electronic resources, librarians currently looking for a holistic approach in their decision making. Librarians believed that Evidence–based Librarianship (EBL) practice is a comprehensive and practical approach that utilizing the best available evidenc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/35910/1/Adillah_Mustafa_ICOL2017.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/35910/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.usm.eprints.35910 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.usm.eprints.35910 http://eprints.usm.my/35910/ Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision Mustafa, A’dillah Abdullah, Noorhidawati Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources In determining the acquisition decision of the electronic resources, librarians currently looking for a holistic approach in their decision making. Librarians believed that Evidence–based Librarianship (EBL) practice is a comprehensive and practical approach that utilizing the best available evidence in library acquisition making. This paper aims to reports the validity of the instrument developed through adopt and adapt methods. Basically, the instrument represents five dimensions of the framework. The instrument was designed to tab the types of evidence used by librarians in their decision. This instrument only focused on the acquisition of electronic resources. The validity analysis is reported using two methods: Content Validity Index (CVI) and Scale level Content Validity Index (S-CVI). The validity analysis also calculated the Scale level Content Validity Index Average (S-CVI/Ave) which score of 0.94 consider as achieved high-level agreement and acceptable. The validation procedures are also described in the report. Overall, this instrument has achieved a good content validity. 2017 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/35910/1/Adillah_Mustafa_ICOL2017.pdf Mustafa, A’dillah and Abdullah, Noorhidawati (2017) Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision. In: International Conference on Libraries (ICOL) 2017, 2-3 August 2017, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. |
institution |
Universiti Sains Malaysia |
building |
Hamzah Sendut Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Sains Malaysia |
content_source |
USM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://eprints.usm.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources |
spellingShingle |
Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources Mustafa, A’dillah Abdullah, Noorhidawati Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
description |
In determining the acquisition decision of the electronic resources, librarians currently looking for a holistic approach in their decision making. Librarians believed that Evidence–based Librarianship (EBL) practice is a comprehensive and practical approach that utilizing the best available evidence in library acquisition making. This paper aims to reports the validity of the instrument developed through adopt and adapt methods. Basically, the instrument represents five dimensions of the framework. The instrument was designed to tab the types of evidence used by librarians in their decision. This instrument only focused on the acquisition of electronic resources. The validity analysis is reported using two methods: Content Validity Index (CVI) and Scale level Content Validity Index (S-CVI). The validity analysis also calculated the Scale level Content Validity Index Average (S-CVI/Ave) which score of 0.94 consider as achieved high-level agreement and acceptable. The validation procedures are also described in the report. Overall, this instrument has achieved a good content validity. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Mustafa, A’dillah Abdullah, Noorhidawati |
author_facet |
Mustafa, A’dillah Abdullah, Noorhidawati |
author_sort |
Mustafa, A’dillah |
title |
Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
title_short |
Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
title_full |
Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
title_fullStr |
Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reporting the Validity of Evidence-Based Librarianship Instrument in Electronic Resources Acquisition Decision |
title_sort |
reporting the validity of evidence-based librarianship instrument in electronic resources acquisition decision |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://eprints.usm.my/35910/1/Adillah_Mustafa_ICOL2017.pdf http://eprints.usm.my/35910/ |
_version_ |
1643708632167088128 |
score |
13.187197 |