An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials
Introduction: Composite resin (CR) is among the commonly used material for intraradicular reinforcement of weakened tooth roots. Purpose: This study was to compare the fracture resistance of experimentally weakened tooth roots reinforced using auto-polymerized composite resin and light-polymerized c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8515 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.usim-8515 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.usim-85152015-12-29T02:57:03Z An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials A.M., Ahmad, W.Z.W., Bakar, A., Husein, M.K., Alam, Adhesive materials Fracture resistance Reinforcement Weakened tooth roots Introduction: Composite resin (CR) is among the commonly used material for intraradicular reinforcement of weakened tooth roots. Purpose: This study was to compare the fracture resistance of experimentally weakened tooth roots reinforced using auto-polymerized composite resin and light-polymerized composite resin. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six extracted human maxillary incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 28) and the root canals were over prepared to weaken it. The samples in Group A were restored using light-cured CR Z100 and light-transmitting polymerizing post (Luminex), whereas Group B using auto-cured CR Alpha-dent. Both groups were placed with metal parapost cemented with a resin luting cement (Nexus 2). Specimens were subjected to compressive load (N) using Instron machine until fracture. Data were submitted to independent t test analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.233) in fracture resistance between the teeth reinforced with light-polymerizing and auto-polymerizing CR are 549.3 (± 95.44) and 490.7 (± 110.37) respectively. Conclusion: The use of less technique sensitive auto-polymerizing CR give equivalent benefit effect on reinforcing weakened roots, as the more commonly light-polymerized composite resin. 2015-06-25T07:29:33Z 2015-06-25T07:29:33Z 2013 Article 22234721 http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8515 en_US |
institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
building |
USIM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universit Sains Islam i Malaysia |
content_source |
USIM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ddms.usim.edu.my/ |
language |
en_US |
topic |
Adhesive materials Fracture resistance Reinforcement Weakened tooth roots |
spellingShingle |
Adhesive materials Fracture resistance Reinforcement Weakened tooth roots A.M., Ahmad, W.Z.W., Bakar, A., Husein, M.K., Alam, An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
description |
Introduction: Composite resin (CR) is among the commonly used material for intraradicular reinforcement of weakened tooth roots. Purpose: This study was to compare the fracture resistance of experimentally weakened tooth roots reinforced using auto-polymerized composite resin and light-polymerized composite resin. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six extracted human maxillary incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 28) and the root canals were over prepared to weaken it. The samples in Group A were restored using light-cured CR Z100 and light-transmitting polymerizing post (Luminex), whereas Group B using auto-cured CR Alpha-dent. Both groups were placed with metal parapost cemented with a resin luting cement (Nexus 2). Specimens were subjected to compressive load (N) using Instron machine until fracture. Data were submitted to independent t test analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.233) in fracture resistance between the teeth reinforced with light-polymerizing and auto-polymerizing CR are 549.3 (± 95.44) and 490.7 (± 110.37) respectively. Conclusion: The use of less technique sensitive auto-polymerizing CR give equivalent benefit effect on reinforcing weakened roots, as the more commonly light-polymerized composite resin. |
format |
Article |
author |
A.M., Ahmad, W.Z.W., Bakar, A., Husein, M.K., Alam, |
author_facet |
A.M., Ahmad, W.Z.W., Bakar, A., Husein, M.K., Alam, |
author_sort |
A.M., Ahmad, |
title |
An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
title_short |
An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
title_full |
An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
title_fullStr |
An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
title_sort |
in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8515 |
_version_ |
1645152431969927168 |
score |
13.222552 |