Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy

AIM: To compare same-day whole-dose vs split-dose of 2-litre polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus bisacodyl for colon cleansing for morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were allocated into two groups i.e., same-day whole-do...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wah-Kheong, Chan,, Sanjiv, Mahadeva,, Khean-Lee, Goh,, Najib, Azmi,
Format: Article
Language:en_US
Published: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8423
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.usim-8423
record_format dspace
spelling my.usim-84232017-02-23T07:18:07Z Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy Wah-Kheong, Chan, Sanjiv, Mahadeva, Khean-Lee, Goh, Najib, Azmi, Bowel preparation Colonoscopy Split-dose Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution AIM: To compare same-day whole-dose vs split-dose of 2-litre polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus bisacodyl for colon cleansing for morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were allocated into two groups i.e., same-day whole-dose or split-dose of 2-litre PEG-ELS. Investigators and endoscopists were blinded to the allocation. All patients completed a questionnaire that was designed by Aronchick and colleagues to assess the tolerability of the bowel preparation regime used. In addition, patients answered an ordinal five-value Likert scale question on comfort level during bowel preparation. Endoscopists graded the quality of bowel preparation using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). In addition, endoscopists gave an overall grading of the quality of bowel preparation. Cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time, adenoma detection rate and number of adenomas detected for each patient were recorded. Sample size was calculated using an online calculator for binary outcome non-inferiority trial. Analyses was based upon intent-to-treat. Significance was assumed at P-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Data for 295 patients were analysed. Mean age was 62.0 +/- 14.4 years old and consisted of 50.2 % male. There were 143 and 152 patients in the split-dose and whole-dose group, respectively. Split-dose was as good as whole-dose for quality of bowel preparation. The total BBPS score was as good in the split-dose group compared to the whole-dose group [6 (6-8) vs 6 (6-7), P = 0.038]. There was no difference in cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time and adenoma detection rate. Median number of adenoma detected was marginally higher in the split-dose group [2 (1-3) vs 1 (1-2), P = 0.010]. Patients in the whole-dose group had more nausea (37.5% vs 25.2%, P = 0.023) and vomiting (16.4% vs 8.4%, P = 0.037), and were less likely to complete the bowel preparation (94.1% vs 99.3%, P = 0.020). Patients in the split-dose group were less likely to refuse the same bowel preparation regime (6.3% vs 13.8%, P = 0.033) and less likely to want to try another bowel preparation regime (53.8% vs 78.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Splitting reduced-volume PEG-ELS for morning colonoscopy is as effective as taking the whole dose on the same morning but is better tolerated and preferred by patients. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2015-06-19T02:04:13Z 2015-06-19T02:04:13Z 2014-01-01 Article 1007-9327 2219-2840 http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8423 en_US Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
institution Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
building USIM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universit Sains Islam i Malaysia
content_source USIM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ddms.usim.edu.my/
language en_US
topic Bowel preparation
Colonoscopy
Split-dose
Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution
spellingShingle Bowel preparation
Colonoscopy
Split-dose
Polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution
Wah-Kheong, Chan,
Sanjiv, Mahadeva,
Khean-Lee, Goh,
Najib, Azmi,
Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
description AIM: To compare same-day whole-dose vs split-dose of 2-litre polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) plus bisacodyl for colon cleansing for morning colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were allocated into two groups i.e., same-day whole-dose or split-dose of 2-litre PEG-ELS. Investigators and endoscopists were blinded to the allocation. All patients completed a questionnaire that was designed by Aronchick and colleagues to assess the tolerability of the bowel preparation regime used. In addition, patients answered an ordinal five-value Likert scale question on comfort level during bowel preparation. Endoscopists graded the quality of bowel preparation using the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS). In addition, endoscopists gave an overall grading of the quality of bowel preparation. Cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time, adenoma detection rate and number of adenomas detected for each patient were recorded. Sample size was calculated using an online calculator for binary outcome non-inferiority trial. Analyses was based upon intent-to-treat. Significance was assumed at P-value < 0.05. RESULTS: Data for 295 patients were analysed. Mean age was 62.0 +/- 14.4 years old and consisted of 50.2 % male. There were 143 and 152 patients in the split-dose and whole-dose group, respectively. Split-dose was as good as whole-dose for quality of bowel preparation. The total BBPS score was as good in the split-dose group compared to the whole-dose group [6 (6-8) vs 6 (6-7), P = 0.038]. There was no difference in cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, total colonoscopy time and adenoma detection rate. Median number of adenoma detected was marginally higher in the split-dose group [2 (1-3) vs 1 (1-2), P = 0.010]. Patients in the whole-dose group had more nausea (37.5% vs 25.2%, P = 0.023) and vomiting (16.4% vs 8.4%, P = 0.037), and were less likely to complete the bowel preparation (94.1% vs 99.3%, P = 0.020). Patients in the split-dose group were less likely to refuse the same bowel preparation regime (6.3% vs 13.8%, P = 0.033) and less likely to want to try another bowel preparation regime (53.8% vs 78.9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Splitting reduced-volume PEG-ELS for morning colonoscopy is as effective as taking the whole dose on the same morning but is better tolerated and preferred by patients. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Wah-Kheong, Chan,
Sanjiv, Mahadeva,
Khean-Lee, Goh,
Najib, Azmi,
author_facet Wah-Kheong, Chan,
Sanjiv, Mahadeva,
Khean-Lee, Goh,
Najib, Azmi,
author_sort Wah-Kheong, Chan,
title Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
title_short Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
title_full Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
title_fullStr Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
title_sort split-dose vs same-day reduced-volume polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for morning colonoscopy
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
publishDate 2015
url http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/8423
_version_ 1645152415482118144
score 13.214268