The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis
The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for analysis were collected from th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.usim-6000 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.usim-60002017-01-09T20:29:51Z The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis Mahazan Abdul Mutalib Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali Faculty of Leadership and Management Islamic leadership Servant leadership Hermeneutics Content analysis The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for analysis were collected from three major secondary sources: the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L), Servant Leadership (S-L), and General Leadership (G-L). The result of an approach based on hermeneutics and content analysis revealed that the concept of Servant Leadership (S-L) accords with Islamic Leadership (I-L) particularly in the aspect of how both of the concepts focus on the aspect ethical leadership. Moreover; based on the nineteen clusters of Islamic Leadership (I-L) designed to examine the ten characteristics of Servant Leadership (S-L) in the open and axial coding process, this research found that the ten characteristics of S-L accord with the nineteen clusters, except in five clusters: justice and equity; profit-orientation; moderation and balance; spiritual, religious, faith in God and piety; and coerciveness under certain circumstances with limitations. The differences have suggested that in general the literature of Servant Leadership (S-L) should be enriched with more ideas pertaining to other aspects of leadership, for example Islamic Leadership (I-L) besides those to do with organisational leadership, while the literature of Islamic Leadership (I-L) should be enriched with more information pertaining to contemporary leadership processes and contexts. 2012-11-09T02:35:25Z 2012-11-09T02:35:25Z 2012-11-09 Conference Paper http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000 en |
institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
building |
USIM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universit Sains Islam i Malaysia |
content_source |
USIM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://ddms.usim.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
topic |
Islamic leadership Servant leadership Hermeneutics Content analysis |
spellingShingle |
Islamic leadership Servant leadership Hermeneutics Content analysis Mahazan Abdul Mutalib Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
description |
The purpose of this research is to explore and examine the similarities and differences
between the concepts of Servant Leadership (S-L) and Islamic Leadership (I-L) through
identifying the characteristics of both concepts as represented in the literature. Data,for
analysis were collected from three major secondary sources: the literature of Islamic
Leadership (I-L), Servant Leadership (S-L), and General Leadership (G-L). The result
of an approach based on hermeneutics and content analysis revealed that the concept of
Servant Leadership (S-L) accords with Islamic Leadership (I-L) particularly in the aspect
of how both of the concepts focus on the aspect ethical leadership. Moreover; based on the
nineteen clusters of Islamic Leadership (I-L) designed to examine the ten characteristics of
Servant Leadership (S-L) in the open and axial coding process, this research found that the
ten characteristics of S-L accord with the nineteen clusters, except in five clusters: justice
and equity; profit-orientation; moderation and balance; spiritual, religious, faith in God
and piety; and coerciveness under certain circumstances with limitations. The differences
have suggested that in general the literature of Servant Leadership (S-L) should be enriched
with more ideas pertaining to other aspects of leadership, for example Islamic Leadership
(I-L) besides those to do with organisational leadership, while the literature of Islamic
Leadership (I-L) should be enriched with more information pertaining to contemporary
leadership processes and contexts. |
author2 |
Faculty of Leadership and Management |
author_facet |
Faculty of Leadership and Management Mahazan Abdul Mutalib Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali |
format |
Conference Paper |
author |
Mahazan Abdul Mutalib Wan Mohd Fazrul Azdi Wan Razali |
author_sort |
Mahazan Abdul Mutalib |
title |
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
title_short |
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full |
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
title_fullStr |
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Concept of Servant and Islamic Leadership: A Comparative Analysis |
title_sort |
concept of servant and islamic leadership: a comparative analysis |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://ddms.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/6000 |
_version_ |
1645151777812643840 |
score |
13.214268 |