PEMAHAMAN TERHADAP METODOLOGI IKHTILAF FIQHI KE ARAH MENYELESAIKAN ISU FANATISME
Jurisprudential dissagreement occurs as a result of mujtahid interpretation of devine scripture. Different methodology adopted by them in the discipline of usul al-fiqh caused the jurisprudential dissagreement. But, when the issue does not clearly understood by Muslims, causing much controversy in t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | |
| Published: |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
2017
|
| Online Access: | http://ddms.usim.edu.my:80/jspui/handle/123456789/14060 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Jurisprudential dissagreement occurs as a result of mujtahid interpretation of devine scripture. Different methodology adopted by them in the discipline of usul al-fiqh caused the jurisprudential dissagreement. But, when the issue does not clearly understood by Muslims, causing much controversy in their life as a result of fanaticism. This article aims to analyze the factors of jurisprudential dissagreement and how the understanding of the factors could resolve the issue of fanaticism among Muslims. The methodology used for this study is a comparative studies as to answer research questions by analyzing the views of Muslim scholars on the issues. The finding of this study shows that, jurisprudential disagreement accepted among scholars is the basis for the development of the discipline of Islamic jurisprudence. This proves that if the methodology of jurisprudential disagreement was clearly understood, then it is able to solve the issue of fanaticism among Muslims. |
|---|