Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)

Objective: To assess the efficacy of butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (BAM) and butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine (BMM) protocols for immobilization of wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) with subsequent antagonization with atipamezole. Study design: Prospective, randomized, blinded cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad, Ali Anwar, Douay, Guillaume, Low, Mary Ruth, Fabbri, Suria, Chen, Hui Cheng
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96476/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1467298721000465?via%3Dihub
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.96476
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.964762023-01-11T09:06:33Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96476/ Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) Ahmad, Ali Anwar Douay, Guillaume Low, Mary Ruth Fabbri, Suria Chen, Hui Cheng Objective: To assess the efficacy of butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (BAM) and butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine (BMM) protocols for immobilization of wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) with subsequent antagonization with atipamezole. Study design: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. Animals: A total of 40 adult wild common palm civets, 24 female and 16 male, weighing 1.5–3.4 kg. Methods: The civets were randomly assigned for anesthesia with butorphanol, azaperone and medetomidine (0.6, 0.6 and 0.2 mg kg–1, respectively; group BAM) or with butorphanol, midazolam and medetomidine (0.3, 0.4 and 0.1 mg kg–1, respectively; group BMM) intramuscularly (IM) in a squeeze cage. When adequately relaxed, the trachea was intubated for oxygen administration. Physiological variables were recorded every 5 minutes after intubation. Following morphometric measurements, sampling, microchipping and parasite treatment, medetomidine was reversed with atipamezole at 1.0 or 0.5 mg kg–1 IM to groups BAM and BMM, respectively. Physiological variables and times to reach the different stages of anesthesia were compared between groups. Results: Onset time of sedation and recumbency was similar in both groups; time to achieve complete relaxation and tracheal intubation was longer in group BAM. Supplementation with isoflurane was required to enable intubation in five civets in group BAM and one civet in group BMM. All civets in group BAM required topical lidocaine to facilitate intubation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower in group BAM, but heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure were not different. All civets in both groups recovered well following administration of atipamezole. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Both BAM and BMM combinations were effective for immobilizing wild common palm civets. The BMM combination had the advantage of producing complete relaxation that allowed intubation more rapidly. Elsevier 2021 Article PeerReviewed Ahmad, Ali Anwar and Douay, Guillaume and Low, Mary Ruth and Fabbri, Suria and Chen, Hui Cheng (2021) Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus). Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 48 (3). 380 - 387. ISSN 1467-2987; ESSN: 1467-2995 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1467298721000465?via%3Dihub 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.02.003
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Objective: To assess the efficacy of butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (BAM) and butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine (BMM) protocols for immobilization of wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus) with subsequent antagonization with atipamezole. Study design: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. Animals: A total of 40 adult wild common palm civets, 24 female and 16 male, weighing 1.5–3.4 kg. Methods: The civets were randomly assigned for anesthesia with butorphanol, azaperone and medetomidine (0.6, 0.6 and 0.2 mg kg–1, respectively; group BAM) or with butorphanol, midazolam and medetomidine (0.3, 0.4 and 0.1 mg kg–1, respectively; group BMM) intramuscularly (IM) in a squeeze cage. When adequately relaxed, the trachea was intubated for oxygen administration. Physiological variables were recorded every 5 minutes after intubation. Following morphometric measurements, sampling, microchipping and parasite treatment, medetomidine was reversed with atipamezole at 1.0 or 0.5 mg kg–1 IM to groups BAM and BMM, respectively. Physiological variables and times to reach the different stages of anesthesia were compared between groups. Results: Onset time of sedation and recumbency was similar in both groups; time to achieve complete relaxation and tracheal intubation was longer in group BAM. Supplementation with isoflurane was required to enable intubation in five civets in group BAM and one civet in group BMM. All civets in group BAM required topical lidocaine to facilitate intubation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was lower in group BAM, but heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure were not different. All civets in both groups recovered well following administration of atipamezole. Conclusions and clinical relevance: Both BAM and BMM combinations were effective for immobilizing wild common palm civets. The BMM combination had the advantage of producing complete relaxation that allowed intubation more rapidly.
format Article
author Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Douay, Guillaume
Low, Mary Ruth
Fabbri, Suria
Chen, Hui Cheng
spellingShingle Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Douay, Guillaume
Low, Mary Ruth
Fabbri, Suria
Chen, Hui Cheng
Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
author_facet Ahmad, Ali Anwar
Douay, Guillaume
Low, Mary Ruth
Fabbri, Suria
Chen, Hui Cheng
author_sort Ahmad, Ali Anwar
title Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_short Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_full Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus)
title_sort comparison of the effects of butorphanol–midazolam–medetomidine and butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine in wild common palm civets (paradoxurus musangus)
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96476/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1467298721000465?via%3Dihub
_version_ 1755873905735630848
score 13.160551