The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance

This study was designed to see whether electronic feedback positively affects medical students’ academic writing performance. Two groups of medical university students were randomly selected and participated in this study. In order to see whether the provision of electronic feedback for the compulso...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noordin, Nooreen, Khojasteh, Laleh
Format: Article
Published: Sciedu Press 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95413/
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/20130
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.95413
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.954132023-01-09T02:06:36Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95413/ The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance Noordin, Nooreen Khojasteh, Laleh This study was designed to see whether electronic feedback positively affects medical students’ academic writing performance. Two groups of medical university students were randomly selected and participated in this study. In order to see whether the provision of electronic feedback for the compulsory academic writing course for medical students is effective, the researchers divided 50 medical students to the traditional (n=25) and intervention groups (n=25). Pre-test and post-test were conducted at the beginning and at the end of the semester. Electronic feedback was given to the medical students in the intervention group, while the medical students in the traditional group received the traditional pen and paper feedback. By comparing the scores of two written assignments at the beginning and the end of the semester, regarding the application of electronic feedback, the results showed that not only medical students’ overall writing performance improved after providing them electronic feedback, but every single writing component was also enhanced after the intervention. There was a significant difference in the post-test academic writing scores between the traditional and intervention groups (P < 0.001). This difference was not significant in our control group who was given pen-and-paper feedback. In terms of specific writing components, the most affected components in this approach were content followed by organization, language use, vocabulary, and sentence mechanics, respectively. Although this study focused on medical students’ academic writing ability and reported the effect of electronic feedback on medical students’ writing performance, electronic feedback can be equally beneficial for enhancing student-practitioners’ practical clinical skills. Sciedu Press 2021-02-19 Article PeerReviewed Noordin, Nooreen and Khojasteh, Laleh (2021) The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance. International Journal of Higher Education, 10 (4). 124 - 134. ISSN 1927-6044; ESSN: 1927-6052 https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/20130 10.5430/ijhe.v10n4p124
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description This study was designed to see whether electronic feedback positively affects medical students’ academic writing performance. Two groups of medical university students were randomly selected and participated in this study. In order to see whether the provision of electronic feedback for the compulsory academic writing course for medical students is effective, the researchers divided 50 medical students to the traditional (n=25) and intervention groups (n=25). Pre-test and post-test were conducted at the beginning and at the end of the semester. Electronic feedback was given to the medical students in the intervention group, while the medical students in the traditional group received the traditional pen and paper feedback. By comparing the scores of two written assignments at the beginning and the end of the semester, regarding the application of electronic feedback, the results showed that not only medical students’ overall writing performance improved after providing them electronic feedback, but every single writing component was also enhanced after the intervention. There was a significant difference in the post-test academic writing scores between the traditional and intervention groups (P < 0.001). This difference was not significant in our control group who was given pen-and-paper feedback. In terms of specific writing components, the most affected components in this approach were content followed by organization, language use, vocabulary, and sentence mechanics, respectively. Although this study focused on medical students’ academic writing ability and reported the effect of electronic feedback on medical students’ writing performance, electronic feedback can be equally beneficial for enhancing student-practitioners’ practical clinical skills.
format Article
author Noordin, Nooreen
Khojasteh, Laleh
spellingShingle Noordin, Nooreen
Khojasteh, Laleh
The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
author_facet Noordin, Nooreen
Khojasteh, Laleh
author_sort Noordin, Nooreen
title The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
title_short The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
title_full The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
title_fullStr The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
title_full_unstemmed The effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
title_sort effects of electronic feedback on medical university students' writing performance
publisher Sciedu Press
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95413/
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/20130
_version_ 1754531216840720384
score 13.18916