Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals

To investigate whether the craniofacial sagittal jaw relationship in patients with non-syndromic cleft differed from non-cleft (NC) individuals by artificial intelligence (A.I.)-driven lateral cephalometric (Late. Ceph.) analysis. The study group comprised 123 subjects with different types of clefts...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alam, Mohammad Khursheed, Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali, Haque, Sanjida, Pooi, Ling Mok, Marya, Anand, Venugopal, Adith, Jamayet, Nafij, Siddiqui, Ammar A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Research Foundation 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/1/Sagittal%20jaw%20relationship%20of%20different%20types%20of%20cleft%20and%20non-cleft%20individuals.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.651951/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.95006
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.950062023-01-04T08:21:49Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/ Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals Alam, Mohammad Khursheed Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali Haque, Sanjida Pooi, Ling Mok Marya, Anand Venugopal, Adith Jamayet, Nafij Siddiqui, Ammar A. To investigate whether the craniofacial sagittal jaw relationship in patients with non-syndromic cleft differed from non-cleft (NC) individuals by artificial intelligence (A.I.)-driven lateral cephalometric (Late. Ceph.) analysis. The study group comprised 123 subjects with different types of clefts including 29 = BCLP (bilateral cleft lip and palate), 41 = UCLP (unilateral cleft lip and palate), 9 = UCLA (unilateral cleft lip and alveolus), 13 = UCL (unilateral cleft lip) and NC = 31. The mean age was 14.77 years. SNA, SNB, ANB angle and Wits appraisal was measured in lateral cephalogram using a new innovative A.I driven Webceph software. Two-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison statistics tests were applied to see the differences between gender and among different types of clefts vs. NC individuals. A significant decrease (p < 0.005) in SNA, ANB, Wits appraisal was observed in different types of clefts vs. NC individuals. SNB (p > 0.005) showed insignificant variables in relation to type of clefts. No significant difference was also found in terms of gender in relation to any type of clefts and NC group. The present study advocates a decrease in sagittal development (SNA, ANB and Wits appraisal) in different types of cleft compared to NC individuals. Frontiers Research Foundation 2021-05-05 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/1/Sagittal%20jaw%20relationship%20of%20different%20types%20of%20cleft%20and%20non-cleft%20individuals.pdf Alam, Mohammad Khursheed and Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali and Haque, Sanjida and Pooi, Ling Mok and Marya, Anand and Venugopal, Adith and Jamayet, Nafij and Siddiqui, Ammar A. (2021) Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9. 01-Jul. ISSN 2296-2360 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.651951/full 10.3389/fped.2021.651951
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description To investigate whether the craniofacial sagittal jaw relationship in patients with non-syndromic cleft differed from non-cleft (NC) individuals by artificial intelligence (A.I.)-driven lateral cephalometric (Late. Ceph.) analysis. The study group comprised 123 subjects with different types of clefts including 29 = BCLP (bilateral cleft lip and palate), 41 = UCLP (unilateral cleft lip and palate), 9 = UCLA (unilateral cleft lip and alveolus), 13 = UCL (unilateral cleft lip) and NC = 31. The mean age was 14.77 years. SNA, SNB, ANB angle and Wits appraisal was measured in lateral cephalogram using a new innovative A.I driven Webceph software. Two-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison statistics tests were applied to see the differences between gender and among different types of clefts vs. NC individuals. A significant decrease (p < 0.005) in SNA, ANB, Wits appraisal was observed in different types of clefts vs. NC individuals. SNB (p > 0.005) showed insignificant variables in relation to type of clefts. No significant difference was also found in terms of gender in relation to any type of clefts and NC group. The present study advocates a decrease in sagittal development (SNA, ANB and Wits appraisal) in different types of cleft compared to NC individuals.
format Article
author Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Haque, Sanjida
Pooi, Ling Mok
Marya, Anand
Venugopal, Adith
Jamayet, Nafij
Siddiqui, Ammar A.
spellingShingle Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Haque, Sanjida
Pooi, Ling Mok
Marya, Anand
Venugopal, Adith
Jamayet, Nafij
Siddiqui, Ammar A.
Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
author_facet Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
Alfawzan, Ahmed Ali
Haque, Sanjida
Pooi, Ling Mok
Marya, Anand
Venugopal, Adith
Jamayet, Nafij
Siddiqui, Ammar A.
author_sort Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
title Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
title_short Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
title_full Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
title_fullStr Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
title_sort sagittal jaw relationship of different types of cleft and non-cleft individuals
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/1/Sagittal%20jaw%20relationship%20of%20different%20types%20of%20cleft%20and%20non-cleft%20individuals.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/95006/
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.651951/full
_version_ 1754531205891489792
score 13.160551