Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers
This study is both quantitative and qualitative in nature. The study focuses on the use of reading comprehension strategies and comprehension level of proficient and low proficient ESL readers in the TESL Matriculation programme of Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The think-aloud technique was us...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Project Paper Report |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
1999
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/1/FPP_1999_68_A.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.upm.eprints.9175 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.91752011-07-25T08:31:06Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/ Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan This study is both quantitative and qualitative in nature. The study focuses on the use of reading comprehension strategies and comprehension level of proficient and low proficient ESL readers in the TESL Matriculation programme of Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The think-aloud technique was used to investigate the use of reading comprehension strategies. The product of reading (comprehension level) was assessed by the means of oral retelling. The findings illustrate that both groups of readers depended much on bottom-up text processing, especially the low proficient ESL readers. The proficient ESL readers however, used significantly more metacognitive and top-down strategies than the low proficient ESL readers. The findings of this study further indicate that the proficient ESL readers tended to use more bottom-up strategies than the low proficient ESL readers. This contradicts findings of previous studies which illustrated that the low proficient ESL readers used more bottom-up strategies than the proficient ESL readers. However, this difference is attributable to the lack of competence in L2 among the low proficient ESL readers. This made them unable to report their thoughts frequently hence perhaps producing bottom-up strategies less than the proficient ESL readers. The findings also illustrate that the proficient ESL readers had a significantly higher level of comprehension than the low proficient ESL readers. The results of the qualitative analysis of think-aloud protocols suggest that the major problem faced by the ESL readers of this study seems to be their inadequate control over grammar and vocabulary in English. This also hindered the subjects' comprehension of the text especially among the low proficient ESL readers. Thus in order to derive meaning from the text, the ESL readers relied on bottom-up strategies. The results of the study also suggest that there is a need to enhance the students' linguistic knowledge in vocabulary and grammar of English as a second language to improve the students' efficient use of the reading strategies. 1999-02 Project Paper Report NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/1/FPP_1999_68_A.pdf Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan (1999) Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers. [Project Paper Report] English |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English English |
description |
This study is both quantitative and qualitative in nature. The study focuses
on the use of reading comprehension strategies and comprehension level of
proficient and low proficient ESL readers in the TESL Matriculation programme of
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The think-aloud technique was used to
investigate the use of reading comprehension strategies. The product of reading
(comprehension level) was assessed by the means of oral retelling.
The findings illustrate that both groups of readers depended much on
bottom-up text processing, especially the low proficient ESL readers. The proficient
ESL readers however, used significantly more metacognitive and top-down
strategies than the low proficient ESL readers. The findings of this study further
indicate that the proficient ESL readers tended to use more bottom-up strategies
than the low proficient ESL readers. This contradicts findings of previous studies
which illustrated that the low proficient ESL readers used more bottom-up strategies
than the proficient ESL readers. However, this difference is attributable to the lack
of competence in L2 among the low proficient ESL readers. This made them unable
to report their thoughts frequently hence perhaps producing bottom-up strategies
less than the proficient ESL readers. The findings also illustrate that the proficient
ESL readers had a significantly higher level of comprehension than the low
proficient ESL readers.
The results of the qualitative analysis of think-aloud protocols suggest that
the major problem faced by the ESL readers of this study seems to be their inadequate control over grammar and vocabulary in English. This also hindered the
subjects' comprehension of the text especially among the low proficient ESL
readers. Thus in order to derive meaning from the text, the ESL readers relied on
bottom-up strategies.
The results of the study also suggest that there is a need to enhance the
students' linguistic knowledge in vocabulary and grammar of English as a second
language to improve the students' efficient use of the reading strategies. |
format |
Project Paper Report |
author |
Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan |
spellingShingle |
Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
author_facet |
Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan |
author_sort |
Danga, Hawa Abdullai Morjan |
title |
Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
title_short |
Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
title_full |
Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
title_fullStr |
Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reading Comprehension Strategies and Comprehension Level of Proficient and Low Proficient ESL Readers |
title_sort |
reading comprehension strategies and comprehension level of proficient and low proficient esl readers |
publishDate |
1999 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/1/FPP_1999_68_A.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9175/ |
_version_ |
1643824233018556416 |
score |
13.209306 |