Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep

Background: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a reliable radiographic modality to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of CBCT image reconstruction parameters, namely, the threshold value and reconstruction voxel size, on trabecular bone m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali, Ibrahim, Norliza, Ahmad, Rohana, Asif, Muhammad Khan, Radzi, Zamri, Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza, Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2020
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/
https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1035-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.88630
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.886302021-11-03T21:39:27Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/ Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim, Norliza Ahmad, Rohana Asif, Muhammad Khan Radzi, Zamri Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal Background: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a reliable radiographic modality to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of CBCT image reconstruction parameters, namely, the threshold value and reconstruction voxel size, on trabecular bone microstructure assessment. Methods: Five sectioned maxilla of adult Dorper male sheep were scanned using a CBCT system with a resolution of 76 μm3 (Kodak 9000). The CBCT images were reconstructed using different reconstruction parameters and analysed. The effect of reconstruction voxel size (76, 100 and 200 μm3) and threshold values (±15% from the global threshold value) on trabecular bone microstructure measurement was assessed using image analysis software (CT analyser version 1.15). Results: There was no significant difference in trabecular bone microstructure measurement between the reconstruction voxel sizes, but a significant difference (Tb.N = 0.03, Tb.Sp = 0.04, Tb.Th = 0.01, BV/TV = 0.00) was apparent when the global threshold value was decreased by 15%. Conclusions: Trabecular bone microstructure measurements are not compromised by changing the CBCT reconstruction voxel size. However, measurements can be affected when applying a threshold value of less than 15% of the recommended global value. BioMed Central 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/1/ABSTRACT.pdf Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali and Ibrahim, Norliza and Ahmad, Rohana and Asif, Muhammad Khan and Radzi, Zamri and Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza and Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal (2020) Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep. BMC Oral Health, 20. art. no. 48. pp. 1-6. ISSN 1472-6831 https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1035-7 10.1186/s12903-020-1035-7
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Background: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a reliable radiographic modality to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of CBCT image reconstruction parameters, namely, the threshold value and reconstruction voxel size, on trabecular bone microstructure assessment. Methods: Five sectioned maxilla of adult Dorper male sheep were scanned using a CBCT system with a resolution of 76 μm3 (Kodak 9000). The CBCT images were reconstructed using different reconstruction parameters and analysed. The effect of reconstruction voxel size (76, 100 and 200 μm3) and threshold values (±15% from the global threshold value) on trabecular bone microstructure measurement was assessed using image analysis software (CT analyser version 1.15). Results: There was no significant difference in trabecular bone microstructure measurement between the reconstruction voxel sizes, but a significant difference (Tb.N = 0.03, Tb.Sp = 0.04, Tb.Th = 0.01, BV/TV = 0.00) was apparent when the global threshold value was decreased by 15%. Conclusions: Trabecular bone microstructure measurements are not compromised by changing the CBCT reconstruction voxel size. However, measurements can be affected when applying a threshold value of less than 15% of the recommended global value.
format Article
author Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali
Ibrahim, Norliza
Ahmad, Rohana
Asif, Muhammad Khan
Radzi, Zamri
Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza
Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal
spellingShingle Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali
Ibrahim, Norliza
Ahmad, Rohana
Asif, Muhammad Khan
Radzi, Zamri
Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza
Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal
Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
author_facet Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali
Ibrahim, Norliza
Ahmad, Rohana
Asif, Muhammad Khan
Radzi, Zamri
Mohamad Zaini, Zuraiza
Abdul Razak, Hairil Rashmizal
author_sort Muhammad Aso, Muhammad Ali
title Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
title_short Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
title_full Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
title_fullStr Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
title_full_unstemmed Effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
title_sort effect of reconstruction parameters on cone beam ct trabecular bone microstructure quantification in sheep
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2020
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/88630/
https://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12903-020-1035-7
_version_ 1717095400067825664
score 13.18916