Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats

Background: Ultrasonographic assessment of the stomach and its layers are performed routinely in companion animals. Varying submucosal thicknesses are seen in cats ultrasonographically, however their attribution to fat deposition, anatomical variation or disease processes remain unknown. Hypothesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Teoh, Yong Bin
Format: Project Paper Report
Language:English
Published: 2017
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/1/FPV%202017%2066%20IR.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.83376
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.833762020-09-17T03:31:55Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/ Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats Teoh, Yong Bin Background: Ultrasonographic assessment of the stomach and its layers are performed routinely in companion animals. Varying submucosal thicknesses are seen in cats ultrasonographically, however their attribution to fat deposition, anatomical variation or disease processes remain unknown. Hypothesis/Objective: To correlate appearance of gastric submucosa on ultrasound with its histology in cats. Animals: 25 cats from animal shelters and pounds. Methods: Following humane euthanasia for various reasons, the stomach was resected and ex-vivo ultrasonography was performed at the fundus, body and pylorus. Ultrasound measurements include thickness of gastric wall (GWUS) and submucosa (GSMUS). Gastric rugae fold (RF) presence was also recorded. Thereafter, histology of the stomach section measured at ultrasound was performed. Histological measurements include thickness of gastric wall (GWH) and submucosa (GSMH) and submucosa fat score (GSMFAT).Results: Fat was present in the gastric submucosa in 96% of cats. However, no association was found between GSMUS and GSMFAT in all regions. GSMUS was correlated to GSMH (r=0.459; P =0.021) in the body. RF was associated to GSMUS in fundus and body. Conclusion: Gastric submucosal thickness is not associated to fat deposition on histology. Nevertheless, ultrasonographic thickness in gastric submucosa corresponds to histology and was also associated to presence of rugae fold. 2017-03 Project Paper Report NonPeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/1/FPV%202017%2066%20IR.pdf Teoh, Yong Bin (2017) Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats. [Project Paper Report]
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Background: Ultrasonographic assessment of the stomach and its layers are performed routinely in companion animals. Varying submucosal thicknesses are seen in cats ultrasonographically, however their attribution to fat deposition, anatomical variation or disease processes remain unknown. Hypothesis/Objective: To correlate appearance of gastric submucosa on ultrasound with its histology in cats. Animals: 25 cats from animal shelters and pounds. Methods: Following humane euthanasia for various reasons, the stomach was resected and ex-vivo ultrasonography was performed at the fundus, body and pylorus. Ultrasound measurements include thickness of gastric wall (GWUS) and submucosa (GSMUS). Gastric rugae fold (RF) presence was also recorded. Thereafter, histology of the stomach section measured at ultrasound was performed. Histological measurements include thickness of gastric wall (GWH) and submucosa (GSMH) and submucosa fat score (GSMFAT).Results: Fat was present in the gastric submucosa in 96% of cats. However, no association was found between GSMUS and GSMFAT in all regions. GSMUS was correlated to GSMH (r=0.459; P =0.021) in the body. RF was associated to GSMUS in fundus and body. Conclusion: Gastric submucosal thickness is not associated to fat deposition on histology. Nevertheless, ultrasonographic thickness in gastric submucosa corresponds to histology and was also associated to presence of rugae fold.
format Project Paper Report
author Teoh, Yong Bin
spellingShingle Teoh, Yong Bin
Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
author_facet Teoh, Yong Bin
author_sort Teoh, Yong Bin
title Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
title_short Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
title_full Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
title_fullStr Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
title_full_unstemmed Ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
title_sort ex vivo correlation of ultrasonographic appearance of gastric submucosal fat with histology in cats
publishDate 2017
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/1/FPV%202017%2066%20IR.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83376/
_version_ 1678594264918917120
score 13.188404