Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology

Platform instability is one of notable causes of error in Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from a low altitude aerial survey. This paper explores the influence of atmospheric pressure (AP) on a drone derived DEM. To achieve the research objective, an experiment was carried out using a fixed-win...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isola, Ajibola Ismaila, Mansor, Shattri, Shafri, Helmi, Pradhan, Biswajeet, Mansor, Yaakob
Format: Article
Published: Association for Geoinformation Technology 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80156/
https://journals.sfu.ca/ijg/index.php/journal/article/view/1248
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.80156
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.801562023-04-05T03:16:43Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80156/ Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology Isola, Ajibola Ismaila Mansor, Shattri Shafri, Helmi Pradhan, Biswajeet Mansor, Yaakob Platform instability is one of notable causes of error in Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from a low altitude aerial survey. This paper explores the influence of atmospheric pressure (AP) on a drone derived DEM. To achieve the research objective, an experiment was carried out using a fixed-wing drone that was flown over a Golf course at the Universiti Putra Malaysia. The drone with an on-board camera captured photos of the study area at a predefined regular time interval. Prior to aerial survey, some ground control points (GCPs) were placed in the study area for image processing and quality assessment. Then flew the drone to capture photos of the study area at seven different altitudes (100m, 150m, 200m, 250m, 350m, 400m, and 500m). An image-matching algorithm was used to process the photos. In the end, seven DEMs were exported in tiff file format. More analysis was carried out with a proposed model to reveal the impact of AP on the resulting DEMs. The impact of AP on DEMs acquired at altitudes stated above are 0.072m, 0.05m, 0.014m, 0.01m, 0.004m, 0.003m, and 0.002m in that order. The results were validated using height of the GCPs and their matching points on the DEMs. The validated test produced RMSE of 0.03m, 0.05m, 0.07m, 0.1m, 0.13m, 0.14m, and 0.16m in that order of altitudes earlier mentioned above. The results reveal that the AP has a small effect on the DEMs. Hence, the impact of AP can be ignored amid of all external forces that can influence the quality of DEM derived by drone system. Association for Geoinformation Technology 2019 Article PeerReviewed Isola, Ajibola Ismaila and Mansor, Shattri and Shafri, Helmi and Pradhan, Biswajeet and Mansor, Yaakob (2019) Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 15 (1). pp. 81-91. ISSN 1686-6576; ESSN: 2673-0014 https://journals.sfu.ca/ijg/index.php/journal/article/view/1248
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Platform instability is one of notable causes of error in Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived from a low altitude aerial survey. This paper explores the influence of atmospheric pressure (AP) on a drone derived DEM. To achieve the research objective, an experiment was carried out using a fixed-wing drone that was flown over a Golf course at the Universiti Putra Malaysia. The drone with an on-board camera captured photos of the study area at a predefined regular time interval. Prior to aerial survey, some ground control points (GCPs) were placed in the study area for image processing and quality assessment. Then flew the drone to capture photos of the study area at seven different altitudes (100m, 150m, 200m, 250m, 350m, 400m, and 500m). An image-matching algorithm was used to process the photos. In the end, seven DEMs were exported in tiff file format. More analysis was carried out with a proposed model to reveal the impact of AP on the resulting DEMs. The impact of AP on DEMs acquired at altitudes stated above are 0.072m, 0.05m, 0.014m, 0.01m, 0.004m, 0.003m, and 0.002m in that order. The results were validated using height of the GCPs and their matching points on the DEMs. The validated test produced RMSE of 0.03m, 0.05m, 0.07m, 0.1m, 0.13m, 0.14m, and 0.16m in that order of altitudes earlier mentioned above. The results reveal that the AP has a small effect on the DEMs. Hence, the impact of AP can be ignored amid of all external forces that can influence the quality of DEM derived by drone system.
format Article
author Isola, Ajibola Ismaila
Mansor, Shattri
Shafri, Helmi
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Mansor, Yaakob
spellingShingle Isola, Ajibola Ismaila
Mansor, Shattri
Shafri, Helmi
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Mansor, Yaakob
Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
author_facet Isola, Ajibola Ismaila
Mansor, Shattri
Shafri, Helmi
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Mansor, Yaakob
author_sort Isola, Ajibola Ismaila
title Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
title_short Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
title_full Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
title_fullStr Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
title_full_unstemmed Impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
title_sort impact of external forces on the quality of digital elevation model derived from drone technology
publisher Association for Geoinformation Technology
publishDate 2019
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80156/
https://journals.sfu.ca/ijg/index.php/journal/article/view/1248
_version_ 1762394202061144064
score 13.2014675