How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of motorcycle safety helmets (MSHs) used by postal delivery riders (PDRs) that comply with the Standards and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia’s (SIRIM) MSH standard guidelines and identify factors that contribute toward...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yellappan, Kaviyarasu, Mani, Kulanthayan K.C., Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/1/How%20safe%20are%20standard%20certified%20motorcycle%20safety%20helmets%20Malaysian%20postal%20delivery%20riders%20scenario.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15389588.2019.1626985?journalCode=gcpi20
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.80087
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.800872020-09-21T06:53:45Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/ How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario Yellappan, Kaviyarasu Mani, Kulanthayan K.C. Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of motorcycle safety helmets (MSHs) used by postal delivery riders (PDRs) that comply with the Standards and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia’s (SIRIM) MSH standard guidelines and identify factors that contribute toward compliance of used MSHs with the standards. Methods: The presence of SIRIM certification label, the status of MSH, type of chinstrap, MSH crash history, and duration of MSH use were observed. The dependent variable was the results of the SIRIM testing procedures (SIRIM tests). MSHs that passed the SIRIM tests were considered “standard certified” MSHs. Results: The odds of the complimentary MSHs passing all of the SIRIM tests were 3.7 times the odds of the self-purchased MSHs passing the tests. The odds of MSHs with the SIRIM certification label passing all of the SIRIM tests were 24.2 times the odds of MSHs without the SIRIM certification label, and the odds of MSHs used <3 years passing the SIRIM tests were 3.75 times the odds of the MSHs used ≥3.8 years. Conclusion: PDRs provided with complimentary MSHs with the SIRIM certification label by the employer for their daily delivery routines and duration of MSH used for less than 3 years were found to be safe MSHs for male occupational riders in Malaysia. Taylor & Francis 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/1/How%20safe%20are%20standard%20certified%20motorcycle%20safety%20helmets%20Malaysian%20postal%20delivery%20riders%20scenario.pdf Yellappan, Kaviyarasu and Mani, Kulanthayan K.C. and Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri (2019) How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20 (4). pp. 624-629. ISSN 1538-9588; ESSN: 1538-957X https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15389588.2019.1626985?journalCode=gcpi20 10.1080/15389588.2019.1626985
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of motorcycle safety helmets (MSHs) used by postal delivery riders (PDRs) that comply with the Standards and Industrial Research Institute of Malaysia’s (SIRIM) MSH standard guidelines and identify factors that contribute toward compliance of used MSHs with the standards. Methods: The presence of SIRIM certification label, the status of MSH, type of chinstrap, MSH crash history, and duration of MSH use were observed. The dependent variable was the results of the SIRIM testing procedures (SIRIM tests). MSHs that passed the SIRIM tests were considered “standard certified” MSHs. Results: The odds of the complimentary MSHs passing all of the SIRIM tests were 3.7 times the odds of the self-purchased MSHs passing the tests. The odds of MSHs with the SIRIM certification label passing all of the SIRIM tests were 24.2 times the odds of MSHs without the SIRIM certification label, and the odds of MSHs used <3 years passing the SIRIM tests were 3.75 times the odds of the MSHs used ≥3.8 years. Conclusion: PDRs provided with complimentary MSHs with the SIRIM certification label by the employer for their daily delivery routines and duration of MSH used for less than 3 years were found to be safe MSHs for male occupational riders in Malaysia.
format Article
author Yellappan, Kaviyarasu
Mani, Kulanthayan K.C.
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
spellingShingle Yellappan, Kaviyarasu
Mani, Kulanthayan K.C.
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
author_facet Yellappan, Kaviyarasu
Mani, Kulanthayan K.C.
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
author_sort Yellappan, Kaviyarasu
title How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
title_short How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
title_full How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
title_fullStr How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
title_full_unstemmed How safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? Malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
title_sort how safe are standard certified motorcycle safety helmets? malaysian postal delivery riders scenario
publisher Taylor & Francis
publishDate 2019
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/1/How%20safe%20are%20standard%20certified%20motorcycle%20safety%20helmets%20Malaysian%20postal%20delivery%20riders%20scenario.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/80087/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15389588.2019.1626985?journalCode=gcpi20
_version_ 1680322358459498496
score 13.160551