The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat

Balanced nutrition is essential for health and performance of livestock. It is best when feed is formulated according to production stages of goat. However, as the goat grows, it may undergo transition of different feed formulation to meet its daily requirement. It may lead to a stressful cond...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri
Format: Project Paper Report
Language:English
Published: 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/1/FPV%202016%2096%20-%20IR.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.78227
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.782272020-06-05T08:49:06Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/ The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri Balanced nutrition is essential for health and performance of livestock. It is best when feed is formulated according to production stages of goat. However, as the goat grows, it may undergo transition of different feed formulation to meet its daily requirement. It may lead to a stressful condition. In this study, body weight gain and feed intake were used to determine effect on performance, whereas hematological stress leucograms were used as stress parameter during implementation of different feed formulation among does. Eighteen adult does with similar body condition score and body weight approximately 20kg were selected and divided into three groups equally (n=6) and fed with different feed formulations, Diet 1 which already being practiced in the farm, Diet 2 which formulated for maintenance requirement and Diet 3 which formulated for flushing for four weeks. Body weight was measured before implementation, Week 2 and Week 4, blood sampling was conducted before implementation and during Week 4 for comparison and feed intake was measured every day. All of the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. Does fed with Diet 3 showed highest body weight gain and feed intake, followed by Diet 2 and Diet 1. There was significant difference (p<0.05) on body weight gain for all groups. Stress parameter on leucocyte counts for Diet 1 showed the highest number as compared to the other groups but no significant difference (p>0.05) as compared to normal value. Neutrophils:lymphocytes ratio for all groups were within normal range and no significant difference (p>0.05). The implementation of feed formulation according to production stages is recommended as it increases performance and prevents from nutritional stress. 2016-03 Project Paper Report NonPeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/1/FPV%202016%2096%20-%20IR.pdf Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri (2016) The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat. [Project Paper Report]
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Balanced nutrition is essential for health and performance of livestock. It is best when feed is formulated according to production stages of goat. However, as the goat grows, it may undergo transition of different feed formulation to meet its daily requirement. It may lead to a stressful condition. In this study, body weight gain and feed intake were used to determine effect on performance, whereas hematological stress leucograms were used as stress parameter during implementation of different feed formulation among does. Eighteen adult does with similar body condition score and body weight approximately 20kg were selected and divided into three groups equally (n=6) and fed with different feed formulations, Diet 1 which already being practiced in the farm, Diet 2 which formulated for maintenance requirement and Diet 3 which formulated for flushing for four weeks. Body weight was measured before implementation, Week 2 and Week 4, blood sampling was conducted before implementation and during Week 4 for comparison and feed intake was measured every day. All of the data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. Does fed with Diet 3 showed highest body weight gain and feed intake, followed by Diet 2 and Diet 1. There was significant difference (p<0.05) on body weight gain for all groups. Stress parameter on leucocyte counts for Diet 1 showed the highest number as compared to the other groups but no significant difference (p>0.05) as compared to normal value. Neutrophils:lymphocytes ratio for all groups were within normal range and no significant difference (p>0.05). The implementation of feed formulation according to production stages is recommended as it increases performance and prevents from nutritional stress.
format Project Paper Report
author Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri
spellingShingle Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri
The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
author_facet Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri
author_sort Roslee, Muhammad Saiful Azri
title The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
title_short The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
title_full The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
title_fullStr The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
title_sort effect of different feed formulation on body weight gain, feed intake and stress parameter in goat
publishDate 2016
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/1/FPV%202016%2096%20-%20IR.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/78227/
_version_ 1669008862883086336
score 13.211869