Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications

Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasiran, Siti Salmah, Jumaat, Abdul Kadir, Manaf, Mazani, Ibrahim, Arsmah, Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina, Abdul Malek, Aminah, Laham, Mohamed Faris, Mahmud, Rozi
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2011
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.69113
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.691132019-06-12T07:34:57Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/ Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications Yasiran, Siti Salmah Jumaat, Abdul Kadir Manaf, Mazani Ibrahim, Arsmah Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina Abdul Malek, Aminah Laham, Mohamed Faris Mahmud, Rozi Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%. IEEE 2011 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf Yasiran, Siti Salmah and Jumaat, Abdul Kadir and Manaf, Mazani and Ibrahim, Arsmah and Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina and Abdul Malek, Aminah and Laham, Mohamed Faris and Mahmud, Rozi (2011) Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE 2011), 4-7 Dec. 2011, Penang, Malaysia. (pp. 597-601). 10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162204
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Snake, active contour or deformable active contour has been widely used in medical image segmentation area. In this paper, comparison between Gradient Vector Flow (GVF) snake and Enhanced Distance (ED) snake in segmenting microcalcifications is carried out. The performance is measured based on actual area of the average percentage difference traced by expert radiologists. Results obtained shows that the values of average percentage difference for the GVF and ED snake are 4.3% and 6.68% respectively. These results indicate that the GVF snake has better performance with 95.7%.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Yasiran, Siti Salmah
Jumaat, Abdul Kadir
Manaf, Mazani
Ibrahim, Arsmah
Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina
Abdul Malek, Aminah
Laham, Mohamed Faris
Mahmud, Rozi
spellingShingle Yasiran, Siti Salmah
Jumaat, Abdul Kadir
Manaf, Mazani
Ibrahim, Arsmah
Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina
Abdul Malek, Aminah
Laham, Mohamed Faris
Mahmud, Rozi
Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
author_facet Yasiran, Siti Salmah
Jumaat, Abdul Kadir
Manaf, Mazani
Ibrahim, Arsmah
Wan Abdul Rahman, Wan Eny Zarina
Abdul Malek, Aminah
Laham, Mohamed Faris
Mahmud, Rozi
author_sort Yasiran, Siti Salmah
title Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_short Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_full Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_fullStr Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between GVF snake and ED snake in segmenting microcalcifications
title_sort comparison between gvf snake and ed snake in segmenting microcalcifications
publisher IEEE
publishDate 2011
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/1/Comparison%20between%20GVF%20snake%20and%20ED%20snake%20in%20segmenting%20microcalcifications.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/69113/
_version_ 1643839402441441280
score 13.211869