Impact of ASEAN rice policy on intra-ASEAN rice trade
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member countries have implemented various plans to achieve the integrated economic growth, political and cultural development in the region. In order to realize their economic goal, the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) has been implemented by me...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/66835/1/IKDPM%202016%203%20IR.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/66835/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member countries have
implemented various plans to achieve the integrated economic growth, political and
cultural development in the region. In order to realize their economic goal, the ASEAN
Economic Community (AEC) has been implemented by member countries through
the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) agreement to experience free market situation.
Due to political and dietary importance of rice, historically, the ASEAN member
governments have intervened in the rice sector using different policy instruments.
However, these interventionist policies may not be sustainable in the long-term as they
incur a high budgetary burden to the government. On the other hand, globalization
asked for a greater market access with gradual elimination of all different types of
market distortions and trade barriers.
In this study, five selected countries which are Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines,
Thailand, and Vietnam have signed several international trade organizations such as
World Trade Organization (WTO), Asian-Pacific Cooperation (APEC) and ASEAN
Free Trade Area (AFTA) to boost free trade market structure. Therefore, they are duty
bound to eliminate governments’ interventions gradually. The main focus of this study
was on quantitative restriction policies which are considered as more effective market
distortion than other governments’ interventions. Therefore, the effect of changes in
the minimum export price policy for Thailand and Vietnam as well as import quota in
Malaysia were examined in this study.
Minimum Export Price (MEP) policy is a method of controlling the volume of export
when the international rice market introduces more competitive price. Thailand and
Vietnam implemented MEP policy after the food crisis of 2007-2008 to control their
rice export price that might change the rice trade flow within ASEAN region. In
addition, Import quota is a way of protecting domestic rice production by giving
permission to only a certain quantity of rice to be imported. In Malaysia, the rice
import quota is constant at 700,000 tons per year which was started in 2010 by the
Malaysian Ministry of Agriculture. The general objective of this study was to investigate the impact of ASEAN rice policy
on Intra-ASEAN rice trade in the five selected ASEAN countries with those following
specific objectives of developing a system dynamics model for ASEAN rice sector,
simulating the impact of ASEAN rice policy on intra-ASEAN rice sector namely
changes in Minimum Export Price in Vietnam and Thailand, and the rice import quota
in Malaysia.
System Dynamics (SD) methodology was used to understand the complexity of rice
sector in five selected ASEAN member countries and forecast the future situation of
rice industry in this region until 2025. First, causal loops diagram were developed
based on the literature explanation of relationships between the variables in the rice
industry, then secondly, stock and flow diagrams were built based on the casual loop
diagrams to run computer simulation and forecast using Vensim software.
Simulations were run based on five scenarios which were designed based on
comparison between Thailand and Vietnam rice export price with international price,
considering the implementation of MEP policy in Thailand and Vietnam along with
eliminating import quota mainly in Malaysia. Simulation results indicated that
Vietnam will dominate the rice market in the region up to 85-90% of total Indonesia,
Malaysia and the Philippines rice import in 2025. However, Thailand might loss up to
less than 10% of its trade partners in the region at the same period of time. Hence,
ASEAN rice importer countries need to manage reliable sources of rice supply
probably from outside the region in case of the shortage in their own local market and
at the time of food crisis due to food security concern. |
---|