Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers

For years, writing academic research articles (RAs) has gained abundant attention from scholars. This is obviously motivated by the fact that writing RAs is an important endeavor through which writers are able to communicate with members in their discourse community with an owned academic voice to p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kashiha, Hadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/1/Recurrent%20formulas%20and%20moves%20in%20writing%20research%20article%20conclusions%20among%20native%20and%20nonnative%20writers.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/7237
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.57130
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.571302017-09-08T02:58:10Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/ Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers Kashiha, Hadi For years, writing academic research articles (RAs) has gained abundant attention from scholars. This is obviously motivated by the fact that writing RAs is an important endeavor through which writers are able to communicate with members in their discourse community with an owned academic voice to perpetuate an identity. This voice is facilitated through the frequent and efficient use of formulaic sequences such as lexical bundles. This study aims to investigate the use of lexical bundles in two different corpora of 200 RA conclusions written by native and Iranian non-native writers. The comparison is premised on the notion that there may be linguistic differences between the two groups of writers and the comparison could serve to highlight how communicative purposes could be conveyed by the bundles in the moves and steps of the conclusions differently. Findings demonstrated that native writers relied more on the use of lexical bundles in writing conclusions. Structurally, the majority of the bundles found in the two corpora were noun or prepositional phrases. While native authors were more inclined to the use of dependent clauses, the bundles found in the L2 corpus contained more verb phrases. Further analysis of the bundles in the moves and steps of the conclusions revealed some marked variations between the two groups. Most of these expressions in the L2 corpus were used in more than one move or step, while in the native corpus, a group of lexical bundles were found to belong to only one move or step of a move. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/1/Recurrent%20formulas%20and%20moves%20in%20writing%20research%20article%20conclusions%20among%20native%20and%20nonnative%20writers.pdf Kashiha, Hadi (2015) Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 21 (1). pp. 47-59. ISSN 0128-5157 http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/7237
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description For years, writing academic research articles (RAs) has gained abundant attention from scholars. This is obviously motivated by the fact that writing RAs is an important endeavor through which writers are able to communicate with members in their discourse community with an owned academic voice to perpetuate an identity. This voice is facilitated through the frequent and efficient use of formulaic sequences such as lexical bundles. This study aims to investigate the use of lexical bundles in two different corpora of 200 RA conclusions written by native and Iranian non-native writers. The comparison is premised on the notion that there may be linguistic differences between the two groups of writers and the comparison could serve to highlight how communicative purposes could be conveyed by the bundles in the moves and steps of the conclusions differently. Findings demonstrated that native writers relied more on the use of lexical bundles in writing conclusions. Structurally, the majority of the bundles found in the two corpora were noun or prepositional phrases. While native authors were more inclined to the use of dependent clauses, the bundles found in the L2 corpus contained more verb phrases. Further analysis of the bundles in the moves and steps of the conclusions revealed some marked variations between the two groups. Most of these expressions in the L2 corpus were used in more than one move or step, while in the native corpus, a group of lexical bundles were found to belong to only one move or step of a move.
format Article
author Kashiha, Hadi
spellingShingle Kashiha, Hadi
Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
author_facet Kashiha, Hadi
author_sort Kashiha, Hadi
title Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
title_short Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
title_full Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
title_fullStr Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
title_sort recurrent formulas and moves in writing research article conclusions among native and nonnative writers
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2015
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/1/Recurrent%20formulas%20and%20moves%20in%20writing%20research%20article%20conclusions%20among%20native%20and%20nonnative%20writers.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57130/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/article/view/7237
_version_ 1643836394183852032
score 13.209306