A critical review of prominent theories of politeness

Politeness plays a crucial role in all cultures and societies for maintaining relationships and for face saving. Although politeness is common to all cultures and languages, how it functions and is realised varies from one culture to another. Different theories have been proposed to examine the stra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y., Md Rashid, Sabariah, Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Australian International Academic Centre 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/1/A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Prominent%20Theories%20of%20Politeness.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.54833
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.548332018-05-22T01:32:59Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/ A critical review of prominent theories of politeness Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y. Md Rashid, Sabariah Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah Politeness plays a crucial role in all cultures and societies for maintaining relationships and for face saving. Although politeness is common to all cultures and languages, how it functions and is realised varies from one culture to another. Different theories have been proposed to examine the strategies with which politeness is expressed. Each theory has weak and strong points which may make it appropriate to a culture but not to another. The most widely used of these theories are Brown and Levinson’s (1978) and its modified version (1987), Lakoff’s (1973), and Leech’s (1983, 2005) theories of politeness. This paper aims to provide a critical review of the aforementioned theories. Specifically, it discusses different scholars’ viewpoints on these theories, highlighting the weak and strong points of the theories. Accordingly, it examines the applicability of these theories to the East and West cultures. A review of these theories indicated that they have weak points as well as strong ones. Furthermore, they might not be suitable for all cultures. This confirms that politeness is a social behaviour not specific to one culture or language. Critical review revealed that Leech’s (2005) Grand Strategy of Politeness might be the most applicable theory that could cover aspects of Eastern and Western cultures. Australian International Academic Centre 2016 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/1/A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Prominent%20Theories%20of%20Politeness.pdf Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y. and Md Rashid, Sabariah and Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah (2016) A critical review of prominent theories of politeness. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7 (6). pp. 262-270. ISSN 2203-4714 10.7575/aiac.alls
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Politeness plays a crucial role in all cultures and societies for maintaining relationships and for face saving. Although politeness is common to all cultures and languages, how it functions and is realised varies from one culture to another. Different theories have been proposed to examine the strategies with which politeness is expressed. Each theory has weak and strong points which may make it appropriate to a culture but not to another. The most widely used of these theories are Brown and Levinson’s (1978) and its modified version (1987), Lakoff’s (1973), and Leech’s (1983, 2005) theories of politeness. This paper aims to provide a critical review of the aforementioned theories. Specifically, it discusses different scholars’ viewpoints on these theories, highlighting the weak and strong points of the theories. Accordingly, it examines the applicability of these theories to the East and West cultures. A review of these theories indicated that they have weak points as well as strong ones. Furthermore, they might not be suitable for all cultures. This confirms that politeness is a social behaviour not specific to one culture or language. Critical review revealed that Leech’s (2005) Grand Strategy of Politeness might be the most applicable theory that could cover aspects of Eastern and Western cultures.
format Article
author Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y.
Md Rashid, Sabariah
Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah
spellingShingle Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y.
Md Rashid, Sabariah
Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah
A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
author_facet Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y.
Md Rashid, Sabariah
Abdullah, Ain Nadzimah
author_sort Al-Duleimi, Hutheifa Y.
title A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
title_short A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
title_full A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
title_fullStr A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
title_full_unstemmed A critical review of prominent theories of politeness
title_sort critical review of prominent theories of politeness
publisher Australian International Academic Centre
publishDate 2016
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/1/A%20Critical%20Review%20of%20Prominent%20Theories%20of%20Politeness.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54833/
_version_ 1643835719259521024
score 13.160551