Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature

Purpose: The paper aims to clearly differentiate knowledge sharing (KS) and knowledge transfer (KT) besides exemplifying their interconnections to minimize the current confusions in the knowledge management (KM) literature. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive literature review method was used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tangaraja, Gangeswari, Mohd Rasdi, Roziah, Abu Samah, Bahaman, Ismail, Maimunah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing 2016
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/1/Knowledge%20sharing%20is%20knowledge%20transfer.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0427
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.54677
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.546772018-04-19T01:20:07Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/ Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature Tangaraja, Gangeswari Mohd Rasdi, Roziah Abu Samah, Bahaman Ismail, Maimunah Purpose: The paper aims to clearly differentiate knowledge sharing (KS) and knowledge transfer (KT) besides exemplifying their interconnections to minimize the current confusions in the knowledge management (KM) literature. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive literature review method was used to analyse relevant literature on both KS and KT to clearly delineate their differences and their interconnections. Findings: The paper found that KS is a subset of KT (using personalization strategy), whereas KT as a whole is a broader concept, if compared with KS. However, KS is not one of the immediate processes involved in KT (using codification strategy). The processes involved in KS and KT differ according to the strategy used (in KT) and perspective chosen (in KS). Other findings include KS (unidirectional) as reflective concept (viewed so far), whereas KS (bidirectional), KT (personalization) and KT (codification) as formative concepts. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this paper were based on the review of selected relevant articles only. Practical Implications: The paper will minimize the current confusions in the KM literature and will assist future researches on both KS and KT to ensure what these concepts entail to avoid construct underrepresentation. Originality/value: As compared to previous attempts, the present paper has shown the interconnections between KS and KT, as well as the differences based on the two perspectives of KS (unidirectional/bidirectional) and the two strategies of KT (personalization/codification), and such effort is new in the literature. Emerald Group Publishing 2016 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/1/Knowledge%20sharing%20is%20knowledge%20transfer.pdf Tangaraja, Gangeswari and Mohd Rasdi, Roziah and Abu Samah, Bahaman and Ismail, Maimunah (2016) Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20 (4). pp. 653-670. ISSN 1367-3270; ESSN: 1758-7484 https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0427 10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0427
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Purpose: The paper aims to clearly differentiate knowledge sharing (KS) and knowledge transfer (KT) besides exemplifying their interconnections to minimize the current confusions in the knowledge management (KM) literature. Design/methodology/approach: An extensive literature review method was used to analyse relevant literature on both KS and KT to clearly delineate their differences and their interconnections. Findings: The paper found that KS is a subset of KT (using personalization strategy), whereas KT as a whole is a broader concept, if compared with KS. However, KS is not one of the immediate processes involved in KT (using codification strategy). The processes involved in KS and KT differ according to the strategy used (in KT) and perspective chosen (in KS). Other findings include KS (unidirectional) as reflective concept (viewed so far), whereas KS (bidirectional), KT (personalization) and KT (codification) as formative concepts. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this paper were based on the review of selected relevant articles only. Practical Implications: The paper will minimize the current confusions in the KM literature and will assist future researches on both KS and KT to ensure what these concepts entail to avoid construct underrepresentation. Originality/value: As compared to previous attempts, the present paper has shown the interconnections between KS and KT, as well as the differences based on the two perspectives of KS (unidirectional/bidirectional) and the two strategies of KT (personalization/codification), and such effort is new in the literature.
format Article
author Tangaraja, Gangeswari
Mohd Rasdi, Roziah
Abu Samah, Bahaman
Ismail, Maimunah
spellingShingle Tangaraja, Gangeswari
Mohd Rasdi, Roziah
Abu Samah, Bahaman
Ismail, Maimunah
Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
author_facet Tangaraja, Gangeswari
Mohd Rasdi, Roziah
Abu Samah, Bahaman
Ismail, Maimunah
author_sort Tangaraja, Gangeswari
title Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
title_short Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
title_full Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
title_fullStr Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
title_sort knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature
publisher Emerald Group Publishing
publishDate 2016
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/1/Knowledge%20sharing%20is%20knowledge%20transfer.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/54677/
https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JKM-11-2015-0427
_version_ 1643835683184312320
score 13.209306