Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS

Groundwater management can be effectively conducted by using groundwater contamination map assessment. In this study, a modified DRASTIC approach using geographic information system (GIS) was applied to evaluate groundwater vulnerability in Kerman plain (Iran). The Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neshat, Aminreza, Pradhan, Biswajeet, Dadras, Mohsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/1/Groundwater%20vulnerability%20assessment%20using%20an%20improved%20DRASTIC%20method%20in%20GIS.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344914000536
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.37798
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.377982015-12-03T04:46:42Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/ Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS Neshat, Aminreza Pradhan, Biswajeet Dadras, Mohsen Groundwater management can be effectively conducted by using groundwater contamination map assessment. In this study, a modified DRASTIC approach using geographic information system (GIS) was applied to evaluate groundwater vulnerability in Kerman plain (Iran). The Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric statistical test was applied to modify the rates of DRASTIC. In addition, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was employed to evaluate the validity of the criteria and sub criteria of all the parameters of the DRASTIC model, which proposed as an alternative treatment of the imprecision demands. The GIS offers spatial analysis in which the multi index evaluation can be effectively conducted through the AHP. The non-point source pollution was effectively determined by the modified DRASTIC method compared with the traditional method. The regression coefficient revealed the relationship between the vulnerability index and the nitrate concentration. The best result was obtained by using AHP–AHP, followed by DRASTIC–AHP, modified DRASTIC–AHP, and AHP–DRASTIC models. In this study, the DRASTIC method failed to provide satisfactory result. Additionally, by using both the original DRASTIC and the modified DRASTIC methods in the study area, AHP–AHP performed highly in the Kerman plain, suggesting that the southern and south east parts of the area considerably calls for conservation against contamination. Elsevier 2014-05 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/1/Groundwater%20vulnerability%20assessment%20using%20an%20improved%20DRASTIC%20method%20in%20GIS.pdf Neshat, Aminreza and Pradhan, Biswajeet and Dadras, Mohsen (2014) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 86. pp. 74-86. ISSN 0921-3449; ESSN: 1879-0658 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344914000536 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.02.008
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description Groundwater management can be effectively conducted by using groundwater contamination map assessment. In this study, a modified DRASTIC approach using geographic information system (GIS) was applied to evaluate groundwater vulnerability in Kerman plain (Iran). The Wilcoxon rank-sum nonparametric statistical test was applied to modify the rates of DRASTIC. In addition, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was employed to evaluate the validity of the criteria and sub criteria of all the parameters of the DRASTIC model, which proposed as an alternative treatment of the imprecision demands. The GIS offers spatial analysis in which the multi index evaluation can be effectively conducted through the AHP. The non-point source pollution was effectively determined by the modified DRASTIC method compared with the traditional method. The regression coefficient revealed the relationship between the vulnerability index and the nitrate concentration. The best result was obtained by using AHP–AHP, followed by DRASTIC–AHP, modified DRASTIC–AHP, and AHP–DRASTIC models. In this study, the DRASTIC method failed to provide satisfactory result. Additionally, by using both the original DRASTIC and the modified DRASTIC methods in the study area, AHP–AHP performed highly in the Kerman plain, suggesting that the southern and south east parts of the area considerably calls for conservation against contamination.
format Article
author Neshat, Aminreza
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Dadras, Mohsen
spellingShingle Neshat, Aminreza
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Dadras, Mohsen
Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
author_facet Neshat, Aminreza
Pradhan, Biswajeet
Dadras, Mohsen
author_sort Neshat, Aminreza
title Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
title_short Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
title_full Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
title_fullStr Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
title_full_unstemmed Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
title_sort groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved drastic method in gis
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2014
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/1/Groundwater%20vulnerability%20assessment%20using%20an%20improved%20DRASTIC%20method%20in%20GIS.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37798/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344914000536
_version_ 1643832065320288256
score 13.159267