Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations

A study was carried out to compare the composition and thermal profiles of the fat component of six brands of commercial biscuits (BA, BB, BC, BD, BE & BF) with those of lard and palm oil. Extraction of fat from biscuit samples was done using petroleum ether according to the soxhlet extraction p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna, Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim, Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2014
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/1/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/
http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/21%20%2801%29%202014/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.37036
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.370362018-05-04T08:51:50Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/ Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo A study was carried out to compare the composition and thermal profiles of the fat component of six brands of commercial biscuits (BA, BB, BC, BD, BE & BF) with those of lard and palm oil. Extraction of fat from biscuit samples was done using petroleum ether according to the soxhlet extraction procedure. The isolated fat samples along with lard and palm oil were analyzed using gas liquid chromatography (GLC), reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). According to GLC analysis, palm oil, lard and all six biscuit brands had either palmitic or oleic acid as major fatty acids. Sn-2 positional analysis of fatty acids showed that oleic (> 60%) as the most dominant fatty acid of palm oil and biscuit brands BA, BB, BC, and BD while palmitic (> 60%) as the most dominant fatty acid of lard and biscuit brands BE and BF. RP-HPLC analysis showed that the triacylglycerol (TAG) profiles of lard and biscuit brands BE and BF were closely similar while those of brands BA, BB, BC, and BD and palm oil were similar. DSC analysis showed that the cooling and heating profiles of lard and brands BE and BF were similar, while those of palm oil and brands BA, BB, BC, and BD were similar. Hence, this study concluded that biscuit brands BE and BF are not suitable for consumers whose religious restriction prohibit the use of lard as food ingredient. Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/1/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna and Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim and Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo (2014) Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations. International Food Research Journal, 21 (1). pp. 277-282. ISSN 1985-4668; ESSN: 2231-7546 http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/21%20%2801%29%202014/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description A study was carried out to compare the composition and thermal profiles of the fat component of six brands of commercial biscuits (BA, BB, BC, BD, BE & BF) with those of lard and palm oil. Extraction of fat from biscuit samples was done using petroleum ether according to the soxhlet extraction procedure. The isolated fat samples along with lard and palm oil were analyzed using gas liquid chromatography (GLC), reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). According to GLC analysis, palm oil, lard and all six biscuit brands had either palmitic or oleic acid as major fatty acids. Sn-2 positional analysis of fatty acids showed that oleic (> 60%) as the most dominant fatty acid of palm oil and biscuit brands BA, BB, BC, and BD while palmitic (> 60%) as the most dominant fatty acid of lard and biscuit brands BE and BF. RP-HPLC analysis showed that the triacylglycerol (TAG) profiles of lard and biscuit brands BE and BF were closely similar while those of brands BA, BB, BC, and BD and palm oil were similar. DSC analysis showed that the cooling and heating profiles of lard and brands BE and BF were similar, while those of palm oil and brands BA, BB, BC, and BD were similar. Hence, this study concluded that biscuit brands BE and BF are not suitable for consumers whose religious restriction prohibit the use of lard as food ingredient.
format Article
author Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna
Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim
Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo
spellingShingle Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna
Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim
Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo
Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
author_facet Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna
Marikkar, Jalaldeen Mohammed Nazrim
Mohammed, Abdulkarim Sabo
author_sort Abdul Manaf, Yanty Noorzianna
title Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
title_short Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
title_full Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
title_fullStr Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
title_full_unstemmed Determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
title_sort determination of types of fat ingredient in some commercial biscuit formulations
publisher Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia
publishDate 2014
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/1/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/37036/
http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/21%20%2801%29%202014/39%20IFRJ%2021%20%2801%29%202014%20Marikkah%20194.pdf
_version_ 1643831896025595904
score 13.211869