Causal Attribution in Academic Achievement Among Malay and Chinese Engineering Undergraduates in Universiti Putra Malaysia
The purpose of this study was to examine causal attribution in the academic achievement of engineering undergraduates in Universiti Putra Malaysia. This study aimed to investigate and compare how Malay and Chinese students perceive causes for various success and failure situations, based on Weine...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2006
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/192/1/549031_FEM_2006_2.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/192/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The purpose of this study was to examine causal attribution in the academic
achievement of engineering undergraduates in Universiti Putra Malaysia. This study
aimed to investigate and compare how Malay and Chinese students perceive causes
for various success and failure situations, based on Weiner’s (1979) threedimensional
taxonomy in categorizing causes. The dimensions are locus of causality,
stability and controllability (further divided into personal and external
controllability). A total of 146 second-year engineering students were selected using
stratified sampling method. The instrument used in this study was the Revised Causal
Dimension Scale (CDSII) designed by McAuley et al. (1992). Questionnaires were
constructed using simulational technique, in which short stories in various situations
of academic achievements were presented. Respondents were asked to read and
identify intensively with the acting persons in the stories. Then, they were asked to
explain causes for the result in that story. In this study, Malay students scored
remarkably lower than Chinese students in terms of average score in CGPA (2.79 for Malays compared with 3.43 for Chinese). Despite evidencing on an average lower
achievement than their Chinese counterparts, t-tests indicated that Malay subjects
rated higher in locus (p < .01) and personal controllability (p < .01) dimensions while
facing success situations. Correlation tests in success situations were consistent with
the findings above, in which CGPA demonstrated negative relationships with both
locus (p < .05) and personal controllability (p < .01) dimensions. This contradiction
of low achievement versus high level in locus and controllability were further
analyzed using subjective attributions provided by the respondents. Some
implications for education were discussed based on culture as well as current social
conditions in Malaysia. In general, Malay students believed that their effort will be
rewarded, and make more internal and controllable attributions when faced with
success in academic achievements. Chinese students also identified with consistent
effort. However, unlike their Malay counterparts, Chinese students relatively
disregarded the role of inconsistent effort in their achievement, thus made less
internal and controllable attributions. |
---|