Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas
This paper presents an investigation on application of metaheuristic approaches to handle the optimization of planting areas with regards to Lining Layout Planning (LLP). Metaheuristic is approximate solution that sacrifice the guarantee of finding an optimal solution. However, it is an appropr...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/1/Prelimanary%20study%20on%20designing%20optimal%20lining%20layout%20by%20metaheuristic%20approaches%20for%20optimizing%20planting%20areas.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/ http://www.ijens.org/108201-6767%20IJECS-IJENS.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.upm.eprints.16294 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
my.upm.eprints.162942016-03-09T04:42:12Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/ Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas Md Badarudin, Ismadi Md Sultan, Abu Bakar Sulaiman, Md. Nasir Mamat, Ali Tengku Muda Mohamed, Mahmud This paper presents an investigation on application of metaheuristic approaches to handle the optimization of planting areas with regards to Lining Layout Planning (LLP). Metaheuristic is approximate solution that sacrifice the guarantee of finding an optimal solution. However, it is an appropriate approach to be employed in two basic situations: 1. a problem may not has an exact method because of ambiguities in the problem statement, 2. a problem may has an axact solution but computational cost of finding it may be prohibitive. The optimization startegy in LLP is to optimize a planting area by looking for the best line direction to be assigned into determining blocks with attention to minimize unused space and maximize number of tree. However, there are many possible solutions to be analyzed will eventually spend high time is a challenge. Therefore, the applicabilty of approaches to overcome this problem was investigated and simulated result was reported. We found that the exact solution methods are suitable for LLP with one block but many blocks with weighted consideration will increase time exponentially and metaheuristic approaches are considered as the appropriate technique. 2010 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/1/Prelimanary%20study%20on%20designing%20optimal%20lining%20layout%20by%20metaheuristic%20approaches%20for%20optimizing%20planting%20areas.pdf Md Badarudin, Ismadi and Md Sultan, Abu Bakar and Sulaiman, Md. Nasir and Mamat, Ali and Tengku Muda Mohamed, Mahmud (2010) Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Science, 10 (1). pp. 92-96. ISSN 2077-1231 http://www.ijens.org/108201-6767%20IJECS-IJENS.pdf |
institution |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
building |
UPM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Putra Malaysia |
content_source |
UPM Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/ |
language |
English |
description |
This paper presents an investigation on application
of metaheuristic approaches to handle the optimization of
planting areas with regards to Lining Layout Planning (LLP).
Metaheuristic is approximate solution that sacrifice the
guarantee of finding an optimal solution. However, it is an
appropriate approach to be employed in two basic situations:
1. a problem may not has an exact method because of
ambiguities in the problem statement, 2. a problem may has
an axact solution but computational cost of finding it may be
prohibitive. The optimization startegy in LLP is to optimize a
planting area by looking for the best line direction to be
assigned into determining blocks with attention to minimize
unused space and maximize number of tree. However, there
are many possible solutions to be analyzed will eventually
spend high time is a challenge. Therefore, the applicabilty of
approaches to overcome this problem was investigated and
simulated result was reported. We found that the exact
solution methods are suitable for LLP with one block but
many blocks with weighted consideration will increase time
exponentially and metaheuristic approaches are considered as
the appropriate technique. |
format |
Article |
author |
Md Badarudin, Ismadi Md Sultan, Abu Bakar Sulaiman, Md. Nasir Mamat, Ali Tengku Muda Mohamed, Mahmud |
spellingShingle |
Md Badarudin, Ismadi Md Sultan, Abu Bakar Sulaiman, Md. Nasir Mamat, Ali Tengku Muda Mohamed, Mahmud Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
author_facet |
Md Badarudin, Ismadi Md Sultan, Abu Bakar Sulaiman, Md. Nasir Mamat, Ali Tengku Muda Mohamed, Mahmud |
author_sort |
Md Badarudin, Ismadi |
title |
Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
title_short |
Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
title_full |
Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
title_fullStr |
Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
title_sort |
prelimanary study on designing optimal lining layout by metaheuristic approaches for optimizing planting areas |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/1/Prelimanary%20study%20on%20designing%20optimal%20lining%20layout%20by%20metaheuristic%20approaches%20for%20optimizing%20planting%20areas.pdf http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/16294/ http://www.ijens.org/108201-6767%20IJECS-IJENS.pdf |
_version_ |
1643826171465433088 |
score |
13.187197 |