Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective

Purpose: Hoisting is an essential construction work package, but there is still a high incidence of accidents due to insufficient attention to coping strategies. This study aims to provide decision support to practitioners on safety protocols by developing a multi-stakeholder risk response model and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junjia, Yin, Alias, Aidi Hizami, Haron, Nuzul Azam, Abu Bakar, Nabilah
Format: Article
Published: Emerald Publishing 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113716/
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ecam-12-2023-1257/full/html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.113716
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1137162025-01-20T01:18:49Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113716/ Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective Junjia, Yin Alias, Aidi Hizami Haron, Nuzul Azam Abu Bakar, Nabilah Purpose: Hoisting is an essential construction work package, but there is still a high incidence of accidents due to insufficient attention to coping strategies. This study aims to provide decision support to practitioners on safety protocols by developing a multi-stakeholder risk response model and a novel evaluation method. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, the study summarizes the hoisting risk response strategies system through a literature review and stakeholder theory. Secondly, the study constructed a quantitative theoretical model based on GLS-SEM and questionnaires. Third, the EWM-VA evaluation method was developed to determine the value coefficients of strategies. Findings: The strategic interaction between government and consultants, consultants and builders, and government and builders are in the top three pronounced. Three coping strategies, “Increase funding for lifting equipment and safety devices,” “Improve the quality of safety education and training on lifting construction,” and “Conduct regular emergency rescue drills for lifting accidents,” have the optimal ratio of benefits to costs. Originality/value: The hoisting risk strategy model from the perspective of multi-interested subjects proposed by the study is based on the global thinking of the project, which reduces the troubles such as the difficulty of pursuing responsibility and the irrational allocation of strategies that were brought by the previously related studies that only considered a single interested subject. In addition, the EWM-VA evaluation method developed in the study also provides new options for evaluating risk strategies and has the potential to be extended to other fields. © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited. Emerald Publishing 2024 Article PeerReviewed Junjia, Yin and Alias, Aidi Hizami and Haron, Nuzul Azam and Abu Bakar, Nabilah (2024) Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. ISSN 0969-9988; eISSN: 0969-9988 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ecam-12-2023-1257/full/html 10.1108/ECAM-12-2023-1257
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Purpose: Hoisting is an essential construction work package, but there is still a high incidence of accidents due to insufficient attention to coping strategies. This study aims to provide decision support to practitioners on safety protocols by developing a multi-stakeholder risk response model and a novel evaluation method. Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, the study summarizes the hoisting risk response strategies system through a literature review and stakeholder theory. Secondly, the study constructed a quantitative theoretical model based on GLS-SEM and questionnaires. Third, the EWM-VA evaluation method was developed to determine the value coefficients of strategies. Findings: The strategic interaction between government and consultants, consultants and builders, and government and builders are in the top three pronounced. Three coping strategies, “Increase funding for lifting equipment and safety devices,” “Improve the quality of safety education and training on lifting construction,” and “Conduct regular emergency rescue drills for lifting accidents,” have the optimal ratio of benefits to costs. Originality/value: The hoisting risk strategy model from the perspective of multi-interested subjects proposed by the study is based on the global thinking of the project, which reduces the troubles such as the difficulty of pursuing responsibility and the irrational allocation of strategies that were brought by the previously related studies that only considered a single interested subject. In addition, the EWM-VA evaluation method developed in the study also provides new options for evaluating risk strategies and has the potential to be extended to other fields. © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited.
format Article
author Junjia, Yin
Alias, Aidi Hizami
Haron, Nuzul Azam
Abu Bakar, Nabilah
spellingShingle Junjia, Yin
Alias, Aidi Hizami
Haron, Nuzul Azam
Abu Bakar, Nabilah
Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
author_facet Junjia, Yin
Alias, Aidi Hizami
Haron, Nuzul Azam
Abu Bakar, Nabilah
author_sort Junjia, Yin
title Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
title_short Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
title_full Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
title_fullStr Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
title_full_unstemmed Developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
title_sort developing a method for evaluating the value of hoisting risk response strategies: a multi-stakeholder perspective
publisher Emerald Publishing
publishDate 2024
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113716/
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ecam-12-2023-1257/full/html
_version_ 1823093066105356288
score 13.23648