Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review

In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children’s physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students’ participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yin, Hang, Omar Dev, Roxana Dev, Soh, Kim Geok, Li, Fangyi, Lian, Menglong
Format: Article
Published: Public Library of Science 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113644/
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307505
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.113644
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1136442024-11-19T07:17:49Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113644/ Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review Yin, Hang Omar Dev, Roxana Dev Soh, Kim Geok Li, Fangyi Lian, Menglong Lian, Menglong In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children’s physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students’ participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases—Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study’s results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers’ (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers’ PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future. Public Library of Science 2024-07 Article PeerReviewed Yin, Hang and Omar Dev, Roxana Dev and Soh, Kim Geok and Li, Fangyi and Lian, Menglong and Lian, Menglong (2024) Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, 19. art. no. e0307505. ISSN 1932-6203; eISSN: 1932-6203 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307505 10.1371/journal.pone.0307505
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description In recent years, physical literacy (PL) has gained a great deal of attention in global academia. Children’s physical activity (PA) participation is severely underrepresented today, and students’ participation in PA and PL level development is strongly dependent on the PL levels of PE teachers. This study aims to offer information for PE teachers to improve their PL levels and for the future development of tools to assess the PL of PE teachers through a systematic review of studies assessing PL of PE teachers. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was used to conduct a comprehensive and systematic search in six databases—Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, ProQuest; and SportDiscus, and a total of 671 papers were retrieved, but after removing duplicates, article identification, and screening only eight papers met the inclusion criteria. This study’s results indicate a paucity of research related to PL among PE teachers, focusing on children, students, older adults, and children with disabilities. PE teachers performed poorly in the physical competence domain and better in the cognitive and affective domains, with a moderate level of overall PL. Only one instrument is currently available to assess PE teachers’ (perceived) PL, and other studies have used instrument components. Therefore, it was concluded that the current PE teachers’ PL level is not high. Also, because the concept of PL among PE teachers has not been standardized, no tool has been developed to evaluate the PL of PE teachers comprehensively and systematically. The CPD (continuing professional development) is considered an effective means of enhancing PL among PE teachers, and research should prioritize the development of CPD programs and tools that are specifically tailored to assess PL among PE teachers in the future.
format Article
author Yin, Hang
Omar Dev, Roxana Dev
Soh, Kim Geok
Li, Fangyi
Lian, Menglong
Lian, Menglong
spellingShingle Yin, Hang
Omar Dev, Roxana Dev
Soh, Kim Geok
Li, Fangyi
Lian, Menglong
Lian, Menglong
Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
author_facet Yin, Hang
Omar Dev, Roxana Dev
Soh, Kim Geok
Li, Fangyi
Lian, Menglong
Lian, Menglong
author_sort Yin, Hang
title Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
title_short Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
title_full Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
title_sort assessment and development of physical education teachers’ physical literacy: a systematic review
publisher Public Library of Science
publishDate 2024
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/113644/
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307505
_version_ 1817844655535947776
score 13.23648