Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review

The ultimate purpose of diabetes care is achieving the outcomes that patients regard as important throughout the life course. Despite advances in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, psychoeducational programs, information technologies, and digital health, the levels of treatment target achievement in p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chew, Boon-How, Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak, Lai, Pauline Siew Mei, Khunti, Kamlesh
Format: Article
Published: Korean Endocrine Society 2023
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/110080/
https://www.e-enm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.3803/EnM.2022.1649
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.110080
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1100802024-09-05T07:41:41Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/110080/ Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review Chew, Boon-How Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak Lai, Pauline Siew Mei Khunti, Kamlesh The ultimate purpose of diabetes care is achieving the outcomes that patients regard as important throughout the life course. Despite advances in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, psychoeducational programs, information technologies, and digital health, the levels of treatment target achievement in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) have remained suboptimal. This clinical care of people with DM is highly challenging, complex, costly, and confounded for patients, physicians, and healthcare systems. One key underlying problem is clinical inertia in general and therapeutic inertia (TI) in particular. TI refers to healthcare providers’ failure to modify therapy appropriately when treatment goals are not met. TI therefore relates to the prescribing decisions made by healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and pharmacists. The known causes of TI include factors at the level of the physician (50%), patient (30%), and health system (20%). Although TI is often multifactorial, the literature suggests that 28% of strategies are targeted at multiple levels of causes, 38% at the patient level, 26% at the healthcare professional level, and only 8% at the healthcare system level. The most effective interventions against TI are shorter intervals until revisit appointments and empowering nurses, diabetes educators, and pharmacists to review treatments and modify prescriptions. Korean Endocrine Society 2023 Article PeerReviewed Chew, Boon-How and Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak and Lai, Pauline Siew Mei and Khunti, Kamlesh (2023) Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 38 (1). pp. 34-42. ISSN 2093-596X; ESSN: 2093-5978 https://www.e-enm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.3803/EnM.2022.1649 10.3803/enm.2022.1649
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description The ultimate purpose of diabetes care is achieving the outcomes that patients regard as important throughout the life course. Despite advances in pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, psychoeducational programs, information technologies, and digital health, the levels of treatment target achievement in people with diabetes mellitus (DM) have remained suboptimal. This clinical care of people with DM is highly challenging, complex, costly, and confounded for patients, physicians, and healthcare systems. One key underlying problem is clinical inertia in general and therapeutic inertia (TI) in particular. TI refers to healthcare providers’ failure to modify therapy appropriately when treatment goals are not met. TI therefore relates to the prescribing decisions made by healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and pharmacists. The known causes of TI include factors at the level of the physician (50%), patient (30%), and health system (20%). Although TI is often multifactorial, the literature suggests that 28% of strategies are targeted at multiple levels of causes, 38% at the patient level, 26% at the healthcare professional level, and only 8% at the healthcare system level. The most effective interventions against TI are shorter intervals until revisit appointments and empowering nurses, diabetes educators, and pharmacists to review treatments and modify prescriptions.
format Article
author Chew, Boon-How
Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak
Lai, Pauline Siew Mei
Khunti, Kamlesh
spellingShingle Chew, Boon-How
Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak
Lai, Pauline Siew Mei
Khunti, Kamlesh
Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
author_facet Chew, Boon-How
Mohd-Yusof, Barakatun-Nisak
Lai, Pauline Siew Mei
Khunti, Kamlesh
author_sort Chew, Boon-How
title Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
title_short Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
title_full Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
title_fullStr Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
title_full_unstemmed Overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: An integrative review
title_sort overcoming therapeutic inertia as the achilles heel for improving suboptimal diabetes care: an integrative review
publisher Korean Endocrine Society
publishDate 2023
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/110080/
https://www.e-enm.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.3803/EnM.2022.1649
_version_ 1811686044146335744
score 13.2014675