Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures

Buffalo meatballs were formulated and the effects of different comminution temperatures on the quality (cooking yield, water holding capacity (WHC), protein, texture, colour, and sensory) were evaluated. During the mixing of ingredients, the comminution temperature was adjusted using different types...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jwee Yie, Lim, Khalid, Nurul Izzah, Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi
Format: Article
Published: Penerbit UTM Press 2023
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/108674/
https://mjfas.utm.my/index.php/mjfas/article/view/2946
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.108674
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1086742024-10-02T04:38:22Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/108674/ Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures Jwee Yie, Lim Khalid, Nurul Izzah Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi Buffalo meatballs were formulated and the effects of different comminution temperatures on the quality (cooking yield, water holding capacity (WHC), protein, texture, colour, and sensory) were evaluated. During the mixing of ingredients, the comminution temperature was adjusted using different types of water which were ice (0°C), ice water (4°C), cold water (10°C), room temperature water (22°C), and warm water (32°C). Following comminution for 3 minutes, the temperatures of the batters were recorded at 14, 25, 25, 29, and 27°C, respectively. The comminution took a total of 15 minutes had produced batters with similar final temperatures (ranging from 36 to 38°C), except ice temperature mixing (28°C). Cold water meatballs produced the highest cooking yield but significantly the lowest (P<0.05) water-holding capacity. The colour of the cold water meatball shows significantly (P<0.05) the highest L* (lightness), significantly (p<0.05) the lowest a* (redness), and the lowest b* (yellowness) values. While the textures (hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, and springiness) of all meatballs were similar (P>0.05). All meatball samples had nearly similar soluble protein concentrations (0.97 to 1.06 ug/ml) but ice water meatballs had the highest (P<0.05). The panellists gave all the meatballs a score ranging from 6.32 to 6.98, with ice meatballs receiving the highest mean score (6.98) acceptability score (P>0.05). In conclusion, comminuted buffalo meatballs can be produced using either ice, ice water, cold water, room temperature water, or warm water without affecting their quality. However, ice is suggested for safety purposes against microbial growth during processing. Penerbit UTM Press 2023-08-27 Article PeerReviewed Jwee Yie, Lim and Khalid, Nurul Izzah and Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi (2023) Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental And Applied Sciences, 19 (4). 573 - 582. ISSN 2289-5981; ESSN: 2289-599X https://mjfas.utm.my/index.php/mjfas/article/view/2946 10.11113/mjfas.v19n4.2946
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description Buffalo meatballs were formulated and the effects of different comminution temperatures on the quality (cooking yield, water holding capacity (WHC), protein, texture, colour, and sensory) were evaluated. During the mixing of ingredients, the comminution temperature was adjusted using different types of water which were ice (0°C), ice water (4°C), cold water (10°C), room temperature water (22°C), and warm water (32°C). Following comminution for 3 minutes, the temperatures of the batters were recorded at 14, 25, 25, 29, and 27°C, respectively. The comminution took a total of 15 minutes had produced batters with similar final temperatures (ranging from 36 to 38°C), except ice temperature mixing (28°C). Cold water meatballs produced the highest cooking yield but significantly the lowest (P<0.05) water-holding capacity. The colour of the cold water meatball shows significantly (P<0.05) the highest L* (lightness), significantly (p<0.05) the lowest a* (redness), and the lowest b* (yellowness) values. While the textures (hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, and springiness) of all meatballs were similar (P>0.05). All meatball samples had nearly similar soluble protein concentrations (0.97 to 1.06 ug/ml) but ice water meatballs had the highest (P<0.05). The panellists gave all the meatballs a score ranging from 6.32 to 6.98, with ice meatballs receiving the highest mean score (6.98) acceptability score (P>0.05). In conclusion, comminuted buffalo meatballs can be produced using either ice, ice water, cold water, room temperature water, or warm water without affecting their quality. However, ice is suggested for safety purposes against microbial growth during processing.
format Article
author Jwee Yie, Lim
Khalid, Nurul Izzah
Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi
spellingShingle Jwee Yie, Lim
Khalid, Nurul Izzah
Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi
Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
author_facet Jwee Yie, Lim
Khalid, Nurul Izzah
Ismail-Fitry, Mohammad Rashedi
author_sort Jwee Yie, Lim
title Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
title_short Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
title_full Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
title_fullStr Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
title_full_unstemmed Quality evaluation of Buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
title_sort quality evaluation of buffalo meatballs produced at different comminution process temperatures
publisher Penerbit UTM Press
publishDate 2023
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/108674/
https://mjfas.utm.my/index.php/mjfas/article/view/2946
_version_ 1814054662144262144
score 13.211869