Effects of blood flow restriction training on bone metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Main Authors: Wang, Xiaolin, Wang, Yifei, Yang, Xuezhen, Mohd Nasiruddin, Nasnoor Juzaily Bin, Dong, Delong, Samsudin, Shamsulariffin Bin, Qin, Xin-Min
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Frontiers Media 2023
• Online Access: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107564/1/fphys-14-1212927.pdf; http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/107564/; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2023.1212927/full

<jats:bold>Introduction:</jats:bold> The efficacy of low-intensity blood flow restriction (LI-BFR) training programs in bone metabolism remains unclear compared to low-intensity (LI) training and high-intensity (HI) training. The aim of this review was to quantitatively identify the effects of LI-BFR training on changes in bone formation markers (i.e., bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, BALP), bone resorption (i.e., C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, CTX) and bone mineral density (BMD) compared with conventional resistance training programmes. Additionally, the effectiveness of walking with and without BFR was assessed.<jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles based on eligibility criteria. Review Manager Version 5.4 was used for Meta-analysis. Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) was applied to assess the methodological quality of studies.<jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> 12 articles were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 378 participants. Meta-results showed that compared with LI training, LI-BFR training induced greater increments in BALP (young adults: MD = 6.70, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001; old adults: MD = 3.94, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), slight increments in BMD (young adults: MD = 0.05, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.00001; old adults: MD = 0.01, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.00001), and greater decrements in CTX (young adults: MD = −0.19, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.15; old adults: MD = −0.07, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.003). Compared with HI training, LI-BFR training produced smaller increments in BALP (young adults: MD = −6.87, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.24; old adults: MD = −0.6, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.58), similar increments in BMD (MD = −0.01, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.76) and similar decrements in CTX (young adults: MD = 0, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.96; old adults: MD = −0.08, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.13). Although there were only two studies on walking training intervention, walking training with BFR had a better effect on bone metabolism than training without BFR.<jats:bold>Discussion:</jats:bold> In conclusion, LI-BFR training induces greater improvements in bone health than LI training, but is less effective than HI training. Therefore, LI-BFR training may be an effective and efficient way to improve bone health for untrained individuals, older adults, or those undergoing musculoskeletal rehabilitation.<jats:bold>Clinical Trial Registration:</jats:bold> [<jats:ext-link>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/</jats:ext-link>], identifier [CRD42023411837].