Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique

This paper presents a modulation strategy applied to a 13-level three-phase transistor clamped H-bridge (TCHB) inverter, aimed at a renewable and electric vehicle drives application. A comparison is performed between the TCHB inverter and a traditional cascaded H-bridge (CHB) inverter, considering c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hossain, Md. Showkot, Said, Nurul Ain Mohd, Abd Halim, Wahidah, Hossain, Md. Hasnat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2024
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/1/22603-46605-1-PB.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/
https://ijpeds.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPEDS/article/view/22603
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.upm.eprints.105680
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.1056802024-07-10T05:18:12Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/ Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique Hossain, Md. Showkot Said, Nurul Ain Mohd Abd Halim, Wahidah Hossain, Md. Hasnat This paper presents a modulation strategy applied to a 13-level three-phase transistor clamped H-bridge (TCHB) inverter, aimed at a renewable and electric vehicle drives application. A comparison is performed between the TCHB inverter and a traditional cascaded H-bridge (CHB) inverter, considering circuit complexity, switching losses, and total harmonic distortion (THD) attained from each multilevel inverter topologies. The TCHB inverter achieves a 13-level output with only 15 switches, whereas the conventional CHB inverter requires 24 switches. The modulation technique, employing a nearest level control, yields improved output quality for both the TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters. The results demonstrate that this strategy effectively minimizes the overall THD. Notably, previous modulation techniques mainly focused on carrier-based PWM or SVPWM, making this approach distinctive. The FFT analysis reveals a voltage THD of 5.49 for TCHB and 5.15 for CHB, indicating a marginal difference in THD content for each multilevel inverter. Despite the CHB inverter experiencing double the switching stress compared to TCHB, since less switches are required in the TCHB inverter, consequently, the system's total cost and complexity are reduced. The achieved results are verified through the use of simulations carried out in the MATLAB Simulink. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2024-01 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/1/22603-46605-1-PB.pdf Hossain, Md. Showkot and Said, Nurul Ain Mohd and Abd Halim, Wahidah and Hossain, Md. Hasnat (2024) Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 15 (1). pp. 292-302. ISSN 2088-8694 https://ijpeds.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPEDS/article/view/22603 10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i1.pp292-302
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
language English
description This paper presents a modulation strategy applied to a 13-level three-phase transistor clamped H-bridge (TCHB) inverter, aimed at a renewable and electric vehicle drives application. A comparison is performed between the TCHB inverter and a traditional cascaded H-bridge (CHB) inverter, considering circuit complexity, switching losses, and total harmonic distortion (THD) attained from each multilevel inverter topologies. The TCHB inverter achieves a 13-level output with only 15 switches, whereas the conventional CHB inverter requires 24 switches. The modulation technique, employing a nearest level control, yields improved output quality for both the TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters. The results demonstrate that this strategy effectively minimizes the overall THD. Notably, previous modulation techniques mainly focused on carrier-based PWM or SVPWM, making this approach distinctive. The FFT analysis reveals a voltage THD of 5.49 for TCHB and 5.15 for CHB, indicating a marginal difference in THD content for each multilevel inverter. Despite the CHB inverter experiencing double the switching stress compared to TCHB, since less switches are required in the TCHB inverter, consequently, the system's total cost and complexity are reduced. The achieved results are verified through the use of simulations carried out in the MATLAB Simulink. © 2024, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.
format Article
author Hossain, Md. Showkot
Said, Nurul Ain Mohd
Abd Halim, Wahidah
Hossain, Md. Hasnat
spellingShingle Hossain, Md. Showkot
Said, Nurul Ain Mohd
Abd Halim, Wahidah
Hossain, Md. Hasnat
Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
author_facet Hossain, Md. Showkot
Said, Nurul Ain Mohd
Abd Halim, Wahidah
Hossain, Md. Hasnat
author_sort Hossain, Md. Showkot
title Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
title_short Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
title_full Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
title_fullStr Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparing performance and complexity of TCHB and CHB multilevel inverters using NLC technique
title_sort comparing performance and complexity of tchb and chb multilevel inverters using nlc technique
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
publishDate 2024
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/1/22603-46605-1-PB.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/105680/
https://ijpeds.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPEDS/article/view/22603
_version_ 1805889519337078784
score 13.214268