AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS
Solar energy is a significant renewable source for home and commercial applications. These solar technologies behave differently depending on the ambient temperature surrounding the devices. Thus, the varying ambient temperature necessitates research into the efficacy of various solar technologies u...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Penerbit UTM Press
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-33995 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-339952024-10-14T11:17:36Z AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS Abdulaziz T. Chan K.-Y. Thien G.S.H. Siow C.-L. Yap B.K. Marlinda A.R. 58665468300 15064967600 56152438600 58666071900 26649255900 55233671600 ambient temperature amorphous silicon monocrystalline silicon photovoltaics polycrystalline silicon Solar energy Solar energy is a significant renewable source for home and commercial applications. These solar technologies behave differently depending on the ambient temperature surrounding the devices. Thus, the varying ambient temperature necessitates research into the efficacy of various solar technologies under real-life circumstances. In this study, three types of solar technology were studied, which were polycrystalline, monocrystalline, and amorphous silicon photovoltaics (PVs). All the PVs were tested under various simulated environments (hot, room, and cold temperatures). Additionally, real environmental condition tests under direct sunlight successfully depicted the relationship between solar irradiance and ambient temperature on the PVs. Overall, monocrystalline PV outperformed polycrystalline PV, whereas amorphous PV performed poorly. This observation was evident in the lowest performance reduction of monocrystalline PV in hot (power, Ppv = 37%), room (Ppv = 82%), cold (Ppv = 95%), and direct sunlight (Ppv = 72%) conditions. Hence, this research could address the importance of selecting PVs in real-life environments in producing efficient solar PV technologies. � 2023, Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved. Final 2024-10-14T03:17:36Z 2024-10-14T03:17:36Z 2023 Article 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.20041 2-s2.0-85174890776 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174890776&doi=10.11113%2fjurnalteknologi.v85.20041&partnerID=40&md5=7864cadf401693087203eae7e509979a https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/33995 85 6 95 103 All Open Access Gold Open Access Penerbit UTM Press Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
ambient temperature amorphous silicon monocrystalline silicon photovoltaics polycrystalline silicon Solar energy |
spellingShingle |
ambient temperature amorphous silicon monocrystalline silicon photovoltaics polycrystalline silicon Solar energy Abdulaziz T. Chan K.-Y. Thien G.S.H. Siow C.-L. Yap B.K. Marlinda A.R. AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
description |
Solar energy is a significant renewable source for home and commercial applications. These solar technologies behave differently depending on the ambient temperature surrounding the devices. Thus, the varying ambient temperature necessitates research into the efficacy of various solar technologies under real-life circumstances. In this study, three types of solar technology were studied, which were polycrystalline, monocrystalline, and amorphous silicon photovoltaics (PVs). All the PVs were tested under various simulated environments (hot, room, and cold temperatures). Additionally, real environmental condition tests under direct sunlight successfully depicted the relationship between solar irradiance and ambient temperature on the PVs. Overall, monocrystalline PV outperformed polycrystalline PV, whereas amorphous PV performed poorly. This observation was evident in the lowest performance reduction of monocrystalline PV in hot (power, Ppv = 37%), room (Ppv = 82%), cold (Ppv = 95%), and direct sunlight (Ppv = 72%) conditions. Hence, this research could address the importance of selecting PVs in real-life environments in producing efficient solar PV technologies. � 2023, Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved. |
author2 |
58665468300 |
author_facet |
58665468300 Abdulaziz T. Chan K.-Y. Thien G.S.H. Siow C.-L. Yap B.K. Marlinda A.R. |
format |
Article |
author |
Abdulaziz T. Chan K.-Y. Thien G.S.H. Siow C.-L. Yap B.K. Marlinda A.R. |
author_sort |
Abdulaziz T. |
title |
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
title_short |
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
title_full |
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
title_fullStr |
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EFFECT ON SILICON PHOTOVOLTAICS UNDER SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTS |
title_sort |
ambient temperature effect on silicon photovoltaics under simulated environments |
publisher |
Penerbit UTM Press |
publishDate |
2024 |
_version_ |
1814061161400762368 |
score |
13.222552 |