Optimal water supply reservoir operation by leveraging the meta-heuristic Harris Hawks algorithms and opposite based learning technique

• Main Authors: Lai V., Huang Y.F., Koo C.H., Ahmed A.N., Sherif M., El-Shafie A.
• Other Authors: 57204919704
• Format: Article
• Published: Nature Research 2024
• Subjects: article; bee; drug efficacy; flooding; genetic algorithm; hawk; learning; metaheuristics; nonhuman; particle swarm optimization; reliability; risk assessment; vulnerability; water deficit; water loss; water supply

To ease water scarcity, dynamic programming, stochastic dynamic programming, and heuristic algorithms have been applied to solve problem matters related to water resources. Development, operation, and management are vital in a reservoir operating policy, especially when the reservoir serves a complex objective. In this study, an attempt via metaheuristic algorithms, namely the Harris Hawks Optimisation (HHO) Algorithm and the Opposite Based Learning of HHO (OBL-HHO) are made to minimise the water deficit as well as mitigate floods at downstream of the Klang Gate Dam (KGD). Due to trade-offs between water supply and flood management, the HHO and OBL-HHO models have configurable thresholds to optimise the KGD reservoir operation. To determine the efficacy of the HHO and OBL-HHO in reservoir optimisation, reliability, vulnerability, and resilience are risk measures evaluated. If inflow categories are omitted, the OBL-HHO meets 71.49% of demand compared to 54.83% for the standalone HHO. The HHO proved superior to OBL-HHO in satisfying demand during medium inflows, achieving 38.60% compared to 20.61%, even though the HHO may have experienced water loss at the end of the storage level. The HHO is still a promising method, as proven by its reliability and resilience indices compared to other published heuristic algorithms: at 62.50% and 1.56, respectively. The Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) outcomes satisfied demand at 61.36%, 59.47% with the Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), 55.68% with the real-coded Genetic Algorithm (GA), and 23.5 percent with the binary GA. For resilience, the ABC scored 0.16, PSO scored 0.15, and real coded GA scored 0.14 whilst the binary-GA has the worst failure recovery algorithm with 0.09. � 2023, The Author(s).