Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems
In this paper, we present a framework for resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems. The conflicts occur in the decision making process of time-constrained tasks of those goals. The agents observe the environment, generate the tasks based on their obligation...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference paper |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-30464 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-304642023-12-29T15:48:09Z Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems Ahmad A. Zaliman M. Yusof M. Ahmad M.S. Ahmed M. Mustapha A. 55390963300 57195320319 6602848301 56036880900 55247787300 57200530694 intentional agent multi-agent systems norms software agents Information technology Multi agent systems Software agents Decision making process Normative agents norms Reward and penalty Intelligent agents In this paper, we present a framework for resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems. The conflicts occur in the decision making process of time-constrained tasks of those goals. The agents observe the environment, generate the tasks based on their obligation to an authority, their desires, and intentions. They select and execute the tasks from a set of pre-compiled tasks based on their beliefs of the reward and penalty associated with the selected tasks. To resolve the conflicts within the constraint of the tasks' duration, we supplement the agents' normative capacity with two essential functions: Sacrifice and Diligence. The Sacrifice function enables an agent to reason and discard any tasks that have lower priorities to make way for accomplishment of the normative goal. The Diligence function enables an agent to increase its effort in accomplishing the normative goal in time-constrained situations. We simulate these situations and present the results. � 2011 IEEE. Final 2023-12-29T07:48:09Z 2023-12-29T07:48:09Z 2011 Conference paper 10.1109/CITA.2011.5999538 2-s2.0-80053032549 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80053032549&doi=10.1109%2fCITA.2011.5999538&partnerID=40&md5=9a91e1731fdb6a8146255f61f911b85f https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30464 5999538 All Open Access; Green Open Access Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
intentional agent multi-agent systems norms software agents Information technology Multi agent systems Software agents Decision making process Normative agents norms Reward and penalty Intelligent agents |
spellingShingle |
intentional agent multi-agent systems norms software agents Information technology Multi agent systems Software agents Decision making process Normative agents norms Reward and penalty Intelligent agents Ahmad A. Zaliman M. Yusof M. Ahmad M.S. Ahmed M. Mustapha A. Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
description |
In this paper, we present a framework for resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems. The conflicts occur in the decision making process of time-constrained tasks of those goals. The agents observe the environment, generate the tasks based on their obligation to an authority, their desires, and intentions. They select and execute the tasks from a set of pre-compiled tasks based on their beliefs of the reward and penalty associated with the selected tasks. To resolve the conflicts within the constraint of the tasks' duration, we supplement the agents' normative capacity with two essential functions: Sacrifice and Diligence. The Sacrifice function enables an agent to reason and discard any tasks that have lower priorities to make way for accomplishment of the normative goal. The Diligence function enables an agent to increase its effort in accomplishing the normative goal in time-constrained situations. We simulate these situations and present the results. � 2011 IEEE. |
author2 |
55390963300 |
author_facet |
55390963300 Ahmad A. Zaliman M. Yusof M. Ahmad M.S. Ahmed M. Mustapha A. |
format |
Conference paper |
author |
Ahmad A. Zaliman M. Yusof M. Ahmad M.S. Ahmed M. Mustapha A. |
author_sort |
Ahmad A. |
title |
Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
title_short |
Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
title_full |
Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
title_fullStr |
Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
title_sort |
resolving conflicts between personal and normative goals in normative agent systems |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806426401341964288 |
score |
13.214268 |