Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management

• Main Author: Jani H.M.
• Other Authors: 13609136000
• Format: Conference paper
• Published: 2023
• Subjects: Higher Education; Intellectual Capacity Building; Total Quality Management; Information science; Learning systems; Quality assurance; Teaching; Total quality management; Continuous improvements; Education systems; Educational systems; Formative evaluation; Higher education; Higher learning; In-buildings; In-line; Intellectual capacity; Learning process; Mastery learning; PDCA cycles; Proper learning; Quality education; Total quality assurance; Traditional learning; Information management

Total quality management (TQM) is a philosophy and a system for continuously improving the services and products offered to customers through ongoing refinements in response to continuous feedback. With regards to higher education, quality education needs to be emphasized in ensuring progressive intellectual capacity building. Both quality assurance and management are critical in ensuring that higher learning institutions provide better services to their primary customers. The continuous improvement and growth focus of TQM would offer more excitement and challenges to students and lecturers as compared to a "good enough" traditional learning environment. In this paper, elements of an education system that focus on total quality assurance and management are discussed. The most important element is to ensure that each staff within the educational system has adequate awareness on quality education. A clear mission and vision must be in place and a proper learning system must be adopted. This paper emphasizes on the mastery learning approach, which is in line with TQM. The learning process follows the Plan, Do, Check, and Act steps or the PDCA cycle. It contains the following steps: Plan, teach (Do), Check (formative evaluation), revised teaching (Act), and Test (summative evaluation). The two main objectives of using TQM in education, which are to improve learning and to improve cost effectiveness, are emphasized. The paper concludes with a framework that can be used as guidelines to total quality assurance and management in higher education. It is hoped that this framework is useful in building intellectual capacity in higher education. � 2011 AICIT.