Comparison study of computational parameter values between LRN and NARX in identifying nonlinear systems

• Main Authors: Nordin F.H., Nagi F.H., Zainul Abidin A.A.
• Other Authors: 25930510500
• Format: Article
• Published: 2023
• Subjects: Layer recurrent network; Nonlinear autoregressive with exogenous inputs; Nonlinear system identification; Recurrent neural network; Complex networks; Identification (control systems); Network layers; Polynomials; Recurrent neural networks; Activation functions; Computational parameters; Correlation coefficient; Investigate and analyze; Non-linear autoregressive with exogenous; Nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous input (NARX); Polynomial equation; Recurrent networks; Nonlinear systems

To determine the nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous inputs (NARX) parameter values is not an easy task, even though NARX is reported to successfully identify nonlinear systems. Apart from the activation functions, number of layers, layer size, learning rate, and number of epochs, the number of delays at the input and at the feedback loop need to also be determined. The layer recurrent network (LRN) is seen to have the potential to outperform NARX. However, not many papers have reported on using the LRN to identify nonlinear systems. Therefore, it is the aim of this paper to investigate and analyze the parametric evaluation of the LRN and NARX in identifying 3 different types of nonlinear systems. From the 3 nonlinear systems, the satellite's attitude state space is more complex compared to the sigmoid and polynomial equations. To ensure an unbiased comparison, a general guideline is used to select the parameter values in an organized manner. The LRN and NARX performance is analyzed based on the training and architecture parameters, mean squared errors, and correlation coefficient values. The results show that the LRN outperformed NARX in training quality, needs equal or fewer parameters that need to be determined through heuristic processes and equal or lower number of epochs, and produced a smaller training error compared to NARX, especially when identifying the satellite's attitude. This indicates that the LRN has the capability of identifying a more complex and nonlinear system compared to NARX. � T�bi?tak.