Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return st...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-29804 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-298042023-12-28T16:57:43Z Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach Wern T.L.T. Mukerjee R.N. 11739827500 7003827066 atmospheric electricity lightning thundercloud A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return stroke and the discharge process, is identified by considering it as a deterministic dynamic system, whose undisturbed and unmeasurable output signal - the lightning peak current, is contaminated with a stochastic disturbance. The model parameters determined thus, are used to predict the likely temporal lightning return stroke peak current magnitudes. Two alternative parametric estimation models namely Autoregressive with Exogeneous Input (ARX) and Autoregressive with Moving-Average Exogeneous Input (ARMAX) are used to estimate model parameters of the pilot study area and predict the likely lightning return stroke peak current in each case. The relative performances of the models are compared to determine the best model for application in 12-hour and 24-hour ahead predictions. For a short-term (12 hour) prediction, ARMAX2921 giving a best fit of 78.8429% turns out to be the most suitable model. For a longer (24 hour) prediction, the ARX291, giving a best fit of 75.0181% emerges to be the suitable model. These preliminary results indicate that lightning peak current may be estimated to a good performance using upper-air radiosonde observations. � Springer-Verlag/Wien 2006. Final 2023-12-28T08:57:43Z 2023-12-28T08:57:43Z 2006 Article 10.1007/s00703-005-0135-x 2-s2.0-31044441880 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-31044441880&doi=10.1007%2fs00703-005-0135-x&partnerID=40&md5=4a4607cf43c11e5ef9e9e915aaa9776f https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/29804 91 01/04/2023 25 44 Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
atmospheric electricity lightning thundercloud |
spellingShingle |
atmospheric electricity lightning thundercloud Wern T.L.T. Mukerjee R.N. Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
description |
A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return stroke and the discharge process, is identified by considering it as a deterministic dynamic system, whose undisturbed and unmeasurable output signal - the lightning peak current, is contaminated with a stochastic disturbance. The model parameters determined thus, are used to predict the likely temporal lightning return stroke peak current magnitudes. Two alternative parametric estimation models namely Autoregressive with Exogeneous Input (ARX) and Autoregressive with Moving-Average Exogeneous Input (ARMAX) are used to estimate model parameters of the pilot study area and predict the likely lightning return stroke peak current in each case. The relative performances of the models are compared to determine the best model for application in 12-hour and 24-hour ahead predictions. For a short-term (12 hour) prediction, ARMAX2921 giving a best fit of 78.8429% turns out to be the most suitable model. For a longer (24 hour) prediction, the ARX291, giving a best fit of 75.0181% emerges to be the suitable model. These preliminary results indicate that lightning peak current may be estimated to a good performance using upper-air radiosonde observations. � Springer-Verlag/Wien 2006. |
author2 |
11739827500 |
author_facet |
11739827500 Wern T.L.T. Mukerjee R.N. |
format |
Article |
author |
Wern T.L.T. Mukerjee R.N. |
author_sort |
Wern T.L.T. |
title |
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
title_short |
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
title_full |
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
title_fullStr |
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
title_sort |
lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806427636705001472 |
score |
13.214268 |