Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach

A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wern T.L.T., Mukerjee R.N.
Other Authors: 11739827500
Format: Article
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-29804
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-298042023-12-28T16:57:43Z Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach Wern T.L.T. Mukerjee R.N. 11739827500 7003827066 atmospheric electricity lightning thundercloud A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return stroke and the discharge process, is identified by considering it as a deterministic dynamic system, whose undisturbed and unmeasurable output signal - the lightning peak current, is contaminated with a stochastic disturbance. The model parameters determined thus, are used to predict the likely temporal lightning return stroke peak current magnitudes. Two alternative parametric estimation models namely Autoregressive with Exogeneous Input (ARX) and Autoregressive with Moving-Average Exogeneous Input (ARMAX) are used to estimate model parameters of the pilot study area and predict the likely lightning return stroke peak current in each case. The relative performances of the models are compared to determine the best model for application in 12-hour and 24-hour ahead predictions. For a short-term (12 hour) prediction, ARMAX2921 giving a best fit of 78.8429% turns out to be the most suitable model. For a longer (24 hour) prediction, the ARX291, giving a best fit of 75.0181% emerges to be the suitable model. These preliminary results indicate that lightning peak current may be estimated to a good performance using upper-air radiosonde observations. � Springer-Verlag/Wien 2006. Final 2023-12-28T08:57:43Z 2023-12-28T08:57:43Z 2006 Article 10.1007/s00703-005-0135-x 2-s2.0-31044441880 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-31044441880&doi=10.1007%2fs00703-005-0135-x&partnerID=40&md5=4a4607cf43c11e5ef9e9e915aaa9776f https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/29804 91 01/04/2023 25 44 Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic atmospheric electricity
lightning
thundercloud
spellingShingle atmospheric electricity
lightning
thundercloud
Wern T.L.T.
Mukerjee R.N.
Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
description A system identification-based lightning peak current estimation algorithm using upper-air radiosonde observations is developed. The preceding convective and precipitative process leading to thunder cloud formation followed by the cloud electrification and the leader processes together with return stroke and the discharge process, is identified by considering it as a deterministic dynamic system, whose undisturbed and unmeasurable output signal - the lightning peak current, is contaminated with a stochastic disturbance. The model parameters determined thus, are used to predict the likely temporal lightning return stroke peak current magnitudes. Two alternative parametric estimation models namely Autoregressive with Exogeneous Input (ARX) and Autoregressive with Moving-Average Exogeneous Input (ARMAX) are used to estimate model parameters of the pilot study area and predict the likely lightning return stroke peak current in each case. The relative performances of the models are compared to determine the best model for application in 12-hour and 24-hour ahead predictions. For a short-term (12 hour) prediction, ARMAX2921 giving a best fit of 78.8429% turns out to be the most suitable model. For a longer (24 hour) prediction, the ARX291, giving a best fit of 75.0181% emerges to be the suitable model. These preliminary results indicate that lightning peak current may be estimated to a good performance using upper-air radiosonde observations. � Springer-Verlag/Wien 2006.
author2 11739827500
author_facet 11739827500
Wern T.L.T.
Mukerjee R.N.
format Article
author Wern T.L.T.
Mukerjee R.N.
author_sort Wern T.L.T.
title Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
title_short Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
title_full Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
title_fullStr Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
title_full_unstemmed Lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
title_sort lightning peak current estimation using a system identification approach
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1806427636705001472
score 13.188404