Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN
It is desirable to position sensor nodes in a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) to be able to provide maximum coverage with minimum energy consumption. However, these two aspects are contradicting and quite impossible to solve the placement problem with a single optimal decision. Thus, a Multi-objective...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference paper |
Published: |
IEEE Computer Society
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-29371 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-293712023-12-28T12:12:48Z Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN Abidin H.Z. Din N.M. Jalil Y.E. 52165115900 9335429400 55257996600 coverage energy multi-objective optimization sensor node placement Wireless Sensor Network Communication systems Energy utilization Sensor nodes Signal processing Wireless sensor networks Biologically inspired coverage energy Minimum energy consumption Objective functions Optimization techniques Sensor node placement Total energy consumption Multiobjective optimization It is desirable to position sensor nodes in a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) to be able to provide maximum coverage with minimum energy consumption. However, these two aspects are contradicting and quite impossible to solve the placement problem with a single optimal decision. Thus, a Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach is needed to facilitate this. This paper studies the performance of a WSN sensor node placement problem solved with a new biologically inspired optimization technique that imitates the behavior of territorial predators in marking their territories with their odours known as Territorial Predator Scent Marking Algorithm (TPSMA). The simulation study is done for a single objective and multi-objective approaches. The MOO approach of TPSMA (MOTPSMA) deployed in this paper uses the minimum energy consumption and maximum coverage as the objective functions while the single objective approach TPSMA only considers maximum coverage. The performance of both approaches is then compared in terms of coverage ratio and total energy consumption. Simulation results show that the WSN deployed with the MOTPSMA is able to reduce the energy consumption although the coverage ratio is slightly lower than single approach TPSMA which only focuses on maximizing the coverage. � 2013 IEEE. Final 2023-12-28T04:12:48Z 2023-12-28T04:12:48Z 2013 Conference paper 10.1109/ICSPCS.2013.6723994 2-s2.0-84903830291 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84903830291&doi=10.1109%2fICSPCS.2013.6723994&partnerID=40&md5=6c43d9e582d8bb69f1b9199657939832 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/29371 6723994 IEEE Computer Society Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
topic |
coverage energy multi-objective optimization sensor node placement Wireless Sensor Network Communication systems Energy utilization Sensor nodes Signal processing Wireless sensor networks Biologically inspired coverage energy Minimum energy consumption Objective functions Optimization techniques Sensor node placement Total energy consumption Multiobjective optimization |
spellingShingle |
coverage energy multi-objective optimization sensor node placement Wireless Sensor Network Communication systems Energy utilization Sensor nodes Signal processing Wireless sensor networks Biologically inspired coverage energy Minimum energy consumption Objective functions Optimization techniques Sensor node placement Total energy consumption Multiobjective optimization Abidin H.Z. Din N.M. Jalil Y.E. Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
description |
It is desirable to position sensor nodes in a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) to be able to provide maximum coverage with minimum energy consumption. However, these two aspects are contradicting and quite impossible to solve the placement problem with a single optimal decision. Thus, a Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach is needed to facilitate this. This paper studies the performance of a WSN sensor node placement problem solved with a new biologically inspired optimization technique that imitates the behavior of territorial predators in marking their territories with their odours known as Territorial Predator Scent Marking Algorithm (TPSMA). The simulation study is done for a single objective and multi-objective approaches. The MOO approach of TPSMA (MOTPSMA) deployed in this paper uses the minimum energy consumption and maximum coverage as the objective functions while the single objective approach TPSMA only considers maximum coverage. The performance of both approaches is then compared in terms of coverage ratio and total energy consumption. Simulation results show that the WSN deployed with the MOTPSMA is able to reduce the energy consumption although the coverage ratio is slightly lower than single approach TPSMA which only focuses on maximizing the coverage. � 2013 IEEE. |
author2 |
52165115900 |
author_facet |
52165115900 Abidin H.Z. Din N.M. Jalil Y.E. |
format |
Conference paper |
author |
Abidin H.Z. Din N.M. Jalil Y.E. |
author_sort |
Abidin H.Z. |
title |
Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
title_short |
Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
title_full |
Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
title_fullStr |
Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multi-objective Optimization (MOO) approach for sensor node placement in WSN |
title_sort |
multi-objective optimization (moo) approach for sensor node placement in wsn |
publisher |
IEEE Computer Society |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806426429949214720 |
score |
13.214268 |