Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction
Both anthropogenic and natural sources of pollution are regionally significant. Therefore, in order to monitor and protect the quality of Langat River from deterioration, we use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to model the river water quality. This study has applied several machine learning models (two...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
MDPI
2023
|
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-26793 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-267932023-05-29T17:36:45Z Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction Najwa Mohd Rizal N. Hayder G. Mnzool M. Elnaim B.M.E. Mohammed A.O.Y. Khayyat M.M. 57880422800 56239664100 57852200500 57212004492 57880616800 57218570964 Both anthropogenic and natural sources of pollution are regionally significant. Therefore, in order to monitor and protect the quality of Langat River from deterioration, we use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to model the river water quality. This study has applied several machine learning models (two support vector machines (SVMs), six regression models, and artificial neural network (ANN)) to predict total suspended solids (TSS), total solids (TS), and dissolved solids (DS)) in Langat River, Malaysia. All of the models have been assessed using root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE) as well as the determination of coefficient (R2). Based on the model performance metrics, the ANN model outperformed all models, while the GPR and SVM models exhibited the characteristic of over-fitting. The remaining machine learning models exhibited fair to poor performances. Although there are a few researches conducted to predict TDS using ANN, however, there are less to no research conducted to predict TS and TSS in Langat River. Therefore, this is the first study to evaluate the water quality (TSS, TS, and DS) of Langat River using the aforementioned models (especially SVM and the six regression models). � 2022 by the authors. Final 2023-05-29T09:36:45Z 2023-05-29T09:36:45Z 2022 Article 10.3390/pr10081652 2-s2.0-85137570511 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85137570511&doi=10.3390%2fpr10081652&partnerID=40&md5=b81e0f1e65798e43e7bb1d1163e36475 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/26793 10 8 1652 All Open Access, Gold MDPI Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
description |
Both anthropogenic and natural sources of pollution are regionally significant. Therefore, in order to monitor and protect the quality of Langat River from deterioration, we use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to model the river water quality. This study has applied several machine learning models (two support vector machines (SVMs), six regression models, and artificial neural network (ANN)) to predict total suspended solids (TSS), total solids (TS), and dissolved solids (DS)) in Langat River, Malaysia. All of the models have been assessed using root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE) as well as the determination of coefficient (R2). Based on the model performance metrics, the ANN model outperformed all models, while the GPR and SVM models exhibited the characteristic of over-fitting. The remaining machine learning models exhibited fair to poor performances. Although there are a few researches conducted to predict TDS using ANN, however, there are less to no research conducted to predict TS and TSS in Langat River. Therefore, this is the first study to evaluate the water quality (TSS, TS, and DS) of Langat River using the aforementioned models (especially SVM and the six regression models). � 2022 by the authors. |
author2 |
57880422800 |
author_facet |
57880422800 Najwa Mohd Rizal N. Hayder G. Mnzool M. Elnaim B.M.E. Mohammed A.O.Y. Khayyat M.M. |
format |
Article |
author |
Najwa Mohd Rizal N. Hayder G. Mnzool M. Elnaim B.M.E. Mohammed A.O.Y. Khayyat M.M. |
spellingShingle |
Najwa Mohd Rizal N. Hayder G. Mnzool M. Elnaim B.M.E. Mohammed A.O.Y. Khayyat M.M. Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
author_sort |
Najwa Mohd Rizal N. |
title |
Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
title_short |
Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
title_full |
Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between Regression Models, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) in River Water Quality Prediction |
title_sort |
comparison between regression models, support vector machine (svm), and artificial neural network (ann) in river water quality prediction |
publisher |
MDPI |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806426543451275264 |
score |
13.214268 |