Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete

This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arbain A., Zawawi M.H., Mohd Radzi M.R., Hassan N.H., Ahmad Mazlan A.Z.
Other Authors: 57213160085
Format: Conference Paper
Published: American Institute of Physics Inc. 2023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-26217
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-262172023-05-29T17:07:53Z Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete Arbain A. Zawawi M.H. Mohd Radzi M.R. Hassan N.H. Ahmad Mazlan A.Z. 57213160085 39162217600 57223347606 57204683370 57216895962 This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a mixture of natural granite, water, cement and other aggregates. In this research, the simulation setup and experimental procedure have been carried out for the purpose of finding the natural frequencies for both samples. For the simulation, a 3D shape of the sample has been modelled using SolidWork software based on the real sample before imported into ANSYS software for modal and harmonic response analyses. Whilst, for experimental, the geometry model of the real sample has been constructed in LMS Test Lab software and a rig to mount the sample has been developed before the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) is conducted. From the results, the natural frequency for the simulation in ANSYS software is determined at 7200 Hz, while for experimental, the natural frequency is at 7399.14 Hz. The percentage error between experiment and simulation is only 2.691 %, thus, it can be considered acceptable and the bonded granite-concrete can be used for the construction of the physical model. � 2021 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved. Final 2023-05-29T09:07:53Z 2023-05-29T09:07:53Z 2021 Conference Paper 10.1063/5.0044239 2-s2.0-85105607958 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105607958&doi=10.1063%2f5.0044239&partnerID=40&md5=0a7b16bd1fa98e697e85c12542dc2427 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/26217 2339 20220 American Institute of Physics Inc. Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
description This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a mixture of natural granite, water, cement and other aggregates. In this research, the simulation setup and experimental procedure have been carried out for the purpose of finding the natural frequencies for both samples. For the simulation, a 3D shape of the sample has been modelled using SolidWork software based on the real sample before imported into ANSYS software for modal and harmonic response analyses. Whilst, for experimental, the geometry model of the real sample has been constructed in LMS Test Lab software and a rig to mount the sample has been developed before the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) is conducted. From the results, the natural frequency for the simulation in ANSYS software is determined at 7200 Hz, while for experimental, the natural frequency is at 7399.14 Hz. The percentage error between experiment and simulation is only 2.691 %, thus, it can be considered acceptable and the bonded granite-concrete can be used for the construction of the physical model. � 2021 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
author2 57213160085
author_facet 57213160085
Arbain A.
Zawawi M.H.
Mohd Radzi M.R.
Hassan N.H.
Ahmad Mazlan A.Z.
format Conference Paper
author Arbain A.
Zawawi M.H.
Mohd Radzi M.R.
Hassan N.H.
Ahmad Mazlan A.Z.
spellingShingle Arbain A.
Zawawi M.H.
Mohd Radzi M.R.
Hassan N.H.
Ahmad Mazlan A.Z.
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
author_sort Arbain A.
title Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
title_short Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
title_full Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
title_fullStr Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
title_full_unstemmed Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
title_sort natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
publisher American Institute of Physics Inc.
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1806424500200275968
score 13.222552