Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete
This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Conference Paper |
Published: |
American Institute of Physics Inc.
2023
|
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-26217 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-262172023-05-29T17:07:53Z Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete Arbain A. Zawawi M.H. Mohd Radzi M.R. Hassan N.H. Ahmad Mazlan A.Z. 57213160085 39162217600 57223347606 57204683370 57216895962 This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a mixture of natural granite, water, cement and other aggregates. In this research, the simulation setup and experimental procedure have been carried out for the purpose of finding the natural frequencies for both samples. For the simulation, a 3D shape of the sample has been modelled using SolidWork software based on the real sample before imported into ANSYS software for modal and harmonic response analyses. Whilst, for experimental, the geometry model of the real sample has been constructed in LMS Test Lab software and a rig to mount the sample has been developed before the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) is conducted. From the results, the natural frequency for the simulation in ANSYS software is determined at 7200 Hz, while for experimental, the natural frequency is at 7399.14 Hz. The percentage error between experiment and simulation is only 2.691 %, thus, it can be considered acceptable and the bonded granite-concrete can be used for the construction of the physical model. � 2021 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved. Final 2023-05-29T09:07:53Z 2023-05-29T09:07:53Z 2021 Conference Paper 10.1063/5.0044239 2-s2.0-85105607958 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105607958&doi=10.1063%2f5.0044239&partnerID=40&md5=0a7b16bd1fa98e697e85c12542dc2427 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/26217 2339 20220 American Institute of Physics Inc. Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
description |
This paper presents the comparison between natural frequencies of pure granite and bonded granite-concrete. A granite is formed by natural processes and is naturally containing solid mass of minerals matter. On the other hand, concrete is not naturally formed but is a man-made material containing a mixture of natural granite, water, cement and other aggregates. In this research, the simulation setup and experimental procedure have been carried out for the purpose of finding the natural frequencies for both samples. For the simulation, a 3D shape of the sample has been modelled using SolidWork software based on the real sample before imported into ANSYS software for modal and harmonic response analyses. Whilst, for experimental, the geometry model of the real sample has been constructed in LMS Test Lab software and a rig to mount the sample has been developed before the Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) is conducted. From the results, the natural frequency for the simulation in ANSYS software is determined at 7200 Hz, while for experimental, the natural frequency is at 7399.14 Hz. The percentage error between experiment and simulation is only 2.691 %, thus, it can be considered acceptable and the bonded granite-concrete can be used for the construction of the physical model. � 2021 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved. |
author2 |
57213160085 |
author_facet |
57213160085 Arbain A. Zawawi M.H. Mohd Radzi M.R. Hassan N.H. Ahmad Mazlan A.Z. |
format |
Conference Paper |
author |
Arbain A. Zawawi M.H. Mohd Radzi M.R. Hassan N.H. Ahmad Mazlan A.Z. |
spellingShingle |
Arbain A. Zawawi M.H. Mohd Radzi M.R. Hassan N.H. Ahmad Mazlan A.Z. Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
author_sort |
Arbain A. |
title |
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
title_short |
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
title_full |
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
title_fullStr |
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
title_full_unstemmed |
Natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
title_sort |
natural frequencies comparison between the pure granite and bonded granite-concrete |
publisher |
American Institute of Physics Inc. |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806424500200275968 |
score |
13.222552 |