Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glyce...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Science Publishing Corporation Inc
2023
|
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my.uniten.dspace-24119 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.uniten.dspace-241192023-05-29T14:55:42Z Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients Razak A.A. Abu-Samah A. Razak N.N. Baharudin S. Suhaimi F. Jamaludin U. Ralib A. Mat-Nor M.B. 56960052400 56719596600 37059587300 55180778800 36247893200 55330889600 37031770900 57226799207 Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glycemic controllers, namely Controller A (blood glucose (BG) target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L) and Controller B (BG target 4.4-10.0 mmol/L) with 1 to 3 hour nursing interventions. These controllers were assessed to determine the better control on diabetic and non-diabetic patients. 66 diabetic and 66 non-diabetic critically ill patient's data from Hospital Tunku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) were employed for virtual trial simulations with a clinically validated physiological model. Performance metrics were assessed within the percentage time in band (TIB) of 4.4 to 8.0 mmol/L, 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L, and 6.0 to 10.0 mmol/L. Controller A shows better performance in normoglycaemic TIB of 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L where non-diabetic and diabetic patients achieved 92.5% and 83.8% respectively. In conclusion, Controller A is higher in efficiency and safer to be used for both patients cohorts. However, higher clinical interventions in diabetic patients within this control raise the alarm to reduce nursing workload. This is believed to improve clinical interventions burnout and ensure patient's comfortability. � 2018 Authors. Final 2023-05-29T06:55:42Z 2023-05-29T06:55:42Z 2018 Article 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22322 2-s2.0-85059224763 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059224763&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.35.22322&partnerID=40&md5=a0349415517ed068eff5dd685bb5c3df https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/24119 7 4 54 58 All Open Access, Bronze, Green Science Publishing Corporation Inc Scopus |
institution |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
building |
UNITEN Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
Universiti Tenaga Nasional |
content_source |
UNITEN Institutional Repository |
url_provider |
http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/ |
description |
Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glycemic controllers, namely Controller A (blood glucose (BG) target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L) and Controller B (BG target 4.4-10.0 mmol/L) with 1 to 3 hour nursing interventions. These controllers were assessed to determine the better control on diabetic and non-diabetic patients. 66 diabetic and 66 non-diabetic critically ill patient's data from Hospital Tunku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) were employed for virtual trial simulations with a clinically validated physiological model. Performance metrics were assessed within the percentage time in band (TIB) of 4.4 to 8.0 mmol/L, 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L, and 6.0 to 10.0 mmol/L. Controller A shows better performance in normoglycaemic TIB of 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L where non-diabetic and diabetic patients achieved 92.5% and 83.8% respectively. In conclusion, Controller A is higher in efficiency and safer to be used for both patients cohorts. However, higher clinical interventions in diabetic patients within this control raise the alarm to reduce nursing workload. This is believed to improve clinical interventions burnout and ensure patient's comfortability. � 2018 Authors. |
author2 |
56960052400 |
author_facet |
56960052400 Razak A.A. Abu-Samah A. Razak N.N. Baharudin S. Suhaimi F. Jamaludin U. Ralib A. Mat-Nor M.B. |
format |
Article |
author |
Razak A.A. Abu-Samah A. Razak N.N. Baharudin S. Suhaimi F. Jamaludin U. Ralib A. Mat-Nor M.B. |
spellingShingle |
Razak A.A. Abu-Samah A. Razak N.N. Baharudin S. Suhaimi F. Jamaludin U. Ralib A. Mat-Nor M.B. Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
author_sort |
Razak A.A. |
title |
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
title_short |
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
title_full |
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
title_fullStr |
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
title_sort |
virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients |
publisher |
Science Publishing Corporation Inc |
publishDate |
2023 |
_version_ |
1806428293907349504 |
score |
13.214268 |