Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate

One of the major issues for semidistributed models is calibration of sensitive parameters. This study compared 3 scenarios for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for calibration and uncertainty. Roodan watershed has been selected for simulation of daily flow in southern part of Iran with an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jajarmizadeh M., Sidek L.M., Harun S., Salarpour M.
Other Authors: 55251767200
Format: Article
Published: SAGE Publications Ltd 2023
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-23099
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-230992023-05-29T14:37:45Z Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate Jajarmizadeh M. Sidek L.M. Harun S. Salarpour M. 55251767200 35070506500 15724724300 55065036200 One of the major issues for semidistributed models is calibration of sensitive parameters. This study compared 3 scenarios for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for calibration and uncertainty. Roodan watershed has been selected for simulation of daily flow in southern part of Iran with an area of 10 570 km2. After preparation of required data and implementation of the SWAT model, sensitivity analysis has been performed by Latin Hypercube One-factor-At-a-Time method on those parameters which are effective for flow simulation. Then, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP) has been used for calibration and uncertainty analysis. Three schemes for calibration were followed for the Roodan watershed modeling in calibration analysis as evolution. These include the following: the global method (scheme 1), this is a method that takes in all globally adjusted sensitive parameters for the whole watershed; the discretization method (scheme 2), this method considered the dominant features in calibration such as land use and soil type; the optimum parameters method (scheme 3), this method only adjusted those sensitive parameters by considering the effectiveness of their features. The results show that scheme 3 has better performance criteria for calibration and uncertainty analysis. Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) coefficient has been obtained 0.75 for scheme 3. However, schemes 1 and 2 resulted in NS 0.71 and 0.74, respectively, between predicted and observed daily flows. Moreover, percentage bias (P-bias) obtained was 6.7, 5.2, and 1.5 for schemes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The result also shows that condition of parameters (parameter set) during calibration in SWAT-CUP program model has an important role to increase the performance of the model. � 2017, � The Author(s) 2017. Final 2023-05-29T06:37:45Z 2023-05-29T06:37:45Z 2017 Article 10.1177/1178622117731792 2-s2.0-85035797848 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85035797848&doi=10.1177%2f1178622117731792&partnerID=40&md5=f464da85a8f56f552fb912c5bb9b6309 https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/23099 10 All Open Access, Gold SAGE Publications Ltd Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
description One of the major issues for semidistributed models is calibration of sensitive parameters. This study compared 3 scenarios for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for calibration and uncertainty. Roodan watershed has been selected for simulation of daily flow in southern part of Iran with an area of 10 570 km2. After preparation of required data and implementation of the SWAT model, sensitivity analysis has been performed by Latin Hypercube One-factor-At-a-Time method on those parameters which are effective for flow simulation. Then, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Program (SWAT-CUP) has been used for calibration and uncertainty analysis. Three schemes for calibration were followed for the Roodan watershed modeling in calibration analysis as evolution. These include the following: the global method (scheme 1), this is a method that takes in all globally adjusted sensitive parameters for the whole watershed; the discretization method (scheme 2), this method considered the dominant features in calibration such as land use and soil type; the optimum parameters method (scheme 3), this method only adjusted those sensitive parameters by considering the effectiveness of their features. The results show that scheme 3 has better performance criteria for calibration and uncertainty analysis. Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) coefficient has been obtained 0.75 for scheme 3. However, schemes 1 and 2 resulted in NS 0.71 and 0.74, respectively, between predicted and observed daily flows. Moreover, percentage bias (P-bias) obtained was 6.7, 5.2, and 1.5 for schemes 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The result also shows that condition of parameters (parameter set) during calibration in SWAT-CUP program model has an important role to increase the performance of the model. � 2017, � The Author(s) 2017.
author2 55251767200
author_facet 55251767200
Jajarmizadeh M.
Sidek L.M.
Harun S.
Salarpour M.
format Article
author Jajarmizadeh M.
Sidek L.M.
Harun S.
Salarpour M.
spellingShingle Jajarmizadeh M.
Sidek L.M.
Harun S.
Salarpour M.
Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
author_sort Jajarmizadeh M.
title Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
title_short Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
title_full Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
title_fullStr Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis of SWAT for an Arid Climate
title_sort optimal calibration and uncertainty analysis of swat for an arid climate
publisher SAGE Publications Ltd
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1806427611325267968
score 13.214268