Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients

Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glyce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Razak, A.A., Abu-Samah, A., Razak, N.N., Baharudin, S., Suhaimi, F., Jamaludin, U., Ralib, A., Mat-Nor, M.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.uniten.dspace-11747
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-117472020-07-08T01:51:01Z Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients Razak, A.A. Abu-Samah, A. Razak, N.N. Baharudin, S. Suhaimi, F. Jamaludin, U. Ralib, A. Mat-Nor, M.B. Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glycemic controllers, namely Controller A (blood glucose (BG) target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L) and Controller B (BG target 4.4-10.0 mmol/L) with 1 to 3 hour nursing interventions. These controllers were assessed to determine the better control on diabetic and non-diabetic patients. 66 diabetic and 66 non-diabetic critically ill patient's data from Hospital Tunku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) were employed for virtual trial simulations with a clinically validated physiological model. Performance metrics were assessed within the percentage time in band (TIB) of 4.4 to 8.0 mmol/L, 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L, and 6.0 to 10.0 mmol/L. Controller A shows better performance in normoglycaemic TIB of 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L where non-diabetic and diabetic patients achieved 92.5% and 83.8% respectively. In conclusion, Controller A is higher in efficiency and safer to be used for both patients cohorts. However, higher clinical interventions in diabetic patients within this control raise the alarm to reduce nursing workload. This is believed to improve clinical interventions burnout and ensure patient's comfortability. © 2018 Authors. 2019-01-23T04:30:48Z 2019-01-23T04:30:48Z 2018 Article 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22322 en
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
language English
description Tight glycaemic control in critically ill patients is used to reduce mortality in intensive care units. However, its usage is debatable in reducing hypoglycaemia or accurately maintain normoglycaemia level. This paper presents the assessment for two 'wider' Stochastic TARgeted (STAR) glycemic controllers, namely Controller A (blood glucose (BG) target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L) and Controller B (BG target 4.4-10.0 mmol/L) with 1 to 3 hour nursing interventions. These controllers were assessed to determine the better control on diabetic and non-diabetic patients. 66 diabetic and 66 non-diabetic critically ill patient's data from Hospital Tunku Ampuan Afzan (HTAA) were employed for virtual trial simulations with a clinically validated physiological model. Performance metrics were assessed within the percentage time in band (TIB) of 4.4 to 8.0 mmol/L, 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L, and 6.0 to 10.0 mmol/L. Controller A shows better performance in normoglycaemic TIB of 4.4 to 10.0 mmol/L where non-diabetic and diabetic patients achieved 92.5% and 83.8% respectively. In conclusion, Controller A is higher in efficiency and safer to be used for both patients cohorts. However, higher clinical interventions in diabetic patients within this control raise the alarm to reduce nursing workload. This is believed to improve clinical interventions burnout and ensure patient's comfortability. © 2018 Authors.
format Article
author Razak, A.A.
Abu-Samah, A.
Razak, N.N.
Baharudin, S.
Suhaimi, F.
Jamaludin, U.
Ralib, A.
Mat-Nor, M.B.
spellingShingle Razak, A.A.
Abu-Samah, A.
Razak, N.N.
Baharudin, S.
Suhaimi, F.
Jamaludin, U.
Ralib, A.
Mat-Nor, M.B.
Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
author_facet Razak, A.A.
Abu-Samah, A.
Razak, N.N.
Baharudin, S.
Suhaimi, F.
Jamaludin, U.
Ralib, A.
Mat-Nor, M.B.
author_sort Razak, A.A.
title Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
title_short Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
title_full Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
title_fullStr Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
title_sort virtual trial of glycaemic control performance and nursing workload assessment in diabetic critically ill patients
publishDate 2019
_version_ 1672614168067309568
score 13.160551