A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda

This paper delves into the intricate landscape of training transfer evaluation, exploring some models, strengths, and areas for improvement in assessing the effectiveness of training programs. This paper aims to analyse and compare training transfer evaluation models using a scoping review methodolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Badriya, Ambu-Saidi, Fung, C. Y., Kristina, Turner, Agnes Lim, Siang Siew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UNIMAS Publisher 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/1/_9_6336_V5.pdf_
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/
https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/JCSHD/article/view/6336
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.6336.2024
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.45600
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.456002024-08-09T07:52:50Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/ A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda Badriya, Ambu-Saidi Fung, C. Y. Kristina, Turner Agnes Lim, Siang Siew H Social Sciences (General) This paper delves into the intricate landscape of training transfer evaluation, exploring some models, strengths, and areas for improvement in assessing the effectiveness of training programs. This paper aims to analyse and compare training transfer evaluation models using a scoping review methodology. By examining their strengths, weaknesses and unique characteristics, the paper seeks to pinpoint opportunities for enhancement. The discussion centres around seminal works such as Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model, Kaufman and Keller's Five Levels of Evaluation, the Phillips Return on Investment Model, Warr et al.’s Context, Input, Reaction and Outcome Model and Brinkerhoff’s Six Stage Model, Bushnell’s input, process, output model. The paper underscores the importance of a comprehensive and adaptable approach to training transfer evaluation, emphasising the need for hybrid models that integrate strengths while addressing weaknesses. The exploration extends to measuring tools and research methods that enhance evaluation practices. The sequential explanatory mixed methods design emerges as an exemplar of a research methodology that seamlessly combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to offer a richer understanding of training transfer. As the paper concludes, it advocates for continuous research efforts to refine models, incorporate emerging technologies, and align evaluation practices with learning and organisational development dynamics. By revealing gaps in current knowledge and identifying previously unknown areas for improvement in training transfer, this paper contributes novel insights to the field of training transfer. UNIMAS Publisher 2024 Article PeerReviewed PDF en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/1/_9_6336_V5.pdf_ Badriya, Ambu-Saidi and Fung, C. Y. and Kristina, Turner and Agnes Lim, Siang Siew (2024) A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 10 (1). pp. 142-170. ISSN 2550-1623 https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/JCSHD/article/view/6336 https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.6336.2024
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
Badriya, Ambu-Saidi
Fung, C. Y.
Kristina, Turner
Agnes Lim, Siang Siew
A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
description This paper delves into the intricate landscape of training transfer evaluation, exploring some models, strengths, and areas for improvement in assessing the effectiveness of training programs. This paper aims to analyse and compare training transfer evaluation models using a scoping review methodology. By examining their strengths, weaknesses and unique characteristics, the paper seeks to pinpoint opportunities for enhancement. The discussion centres around seminal works such as Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model, Kaufman and Keller's Five Levels of Evaluation, the Phillips Return on Investment Model, Warr et al.’s Context, Input, Reaction and Outcome Model and Brinkerhoff’s Six Stage Model, Bushnell’s input, process, output model. The paper underscores the importance of a comprehensive and adaptable approach to training transfer evaluation, emphasising the need for hybrid models that integrate strengths while addressing weaknesses. The exploration extends to measuring tools and research methods that enhance evaluation practices. The sequential explanatory mixed methods design emerges as an exemplar of a research methodology that seamlessly combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to offer a richer understanding of training transfer. As the paper concludes, it advocates for continuous research efforts to refine models, incorporate emerging technologies, and align evaluation practices with learning and organisational development dynamics. By revealing gaps in current knowledge and identifying previously unknown areas for improvement in training transfer, this paper contributes novel insights to the field of training transfer.
format Article
author Badriya, Ambu-Saidi
Fung, C. Y.
Kristina, Turner
Agnes Lim, Siang Siew
author_facet Badriya, Ambu-Saidi
Fung, C. Y.
Kristina, Turner
Agnes Lim, Siang Siew
author_sort Badriya, Ambu-Saidi
title A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
title_short A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
title_full A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
title_fullStr A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
title_full_unstemmed A critical review on training evaluation models : A search for future agenda
title_sort critical review on training evaluation models : a search for future agenda
publisher UNIMAS Publisher
publishDate 2024
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/1/_9_6336_V5.pdf_
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/45600/
https://publisher.unimas.my/ojs/index.php/JCSHD/article/view/6336
https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.6336.2024
_version_ 1807055185231478784
score 13.209306