Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire

Gender role beliefs refer to individuals’ belief that men and women should shoulder their role-related behaviour. Evidence showed that patriarchal gender roles are directly associated with violence perpetration. Gender roles can be measured with the GEMS questionnaire, which was developed in English...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siti Romahani, Rahman, Md Mizanur, Rahman, Zi Sheng, Yeo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/2/Realiability.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/
https://jummec.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/39589
https://doi.org/10.22452/jummec.vol27no1.13
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my.unimas.ir.44228
record_format eprints
spelling my.unimas.ir.442282024-01-19T00:31:42Z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/ Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire Siti Romahani, Rahman Md Mizanur, Rahman Zi Sheng, Yeo R Medicine (General) Gender role beliefs refer to individuals’ belief that men and women should shoulder their role-related behaviour. Evidence showed that patriarchal gender roles are directly associated with violence perpetration. Gender roles can be measured with the GEMS questionnaire, which was developed in English. Thus, it needs to be adapted to the local language to be used in a family violence study among married men in Sarawak, Malaysia. This study aims to translate and validate the original English version of the GEMS into the Malay language. The English version was translated forward and backward into Malay, followed by content validation by six public health and language experts. The scale was further tested for face validity among 30 people from the general population, followed by a cross-sectional study involving 200 male respondents. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranges from 0.83 to 1. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three components within the scale, and confirmatory factor analysis established convergent and discriminant validity. The overall Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.778 to 0.921. In conclusion, the Malay version of the GEMS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring gender equitability among men in Sibu, Sarawak. Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya 2024-01 Article PeerReviewed text en http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/2/Realiability.pdf Siti Romahani, Rahman and Md Mizanur, Rahman and Zi Sheng, Yeo (2024) Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire. Journal of Health and Translational Medicine (JUMMEC), 27 (1). pp. 88-95. ISSN 2289-392X https://jummec.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/39589 https://doi.org/10.22452/jummec.vol27no1.13
institution Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
building Centre for Academic Information Services (CAIS)
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
content_source UNIMAS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://ir.unimas.my/
language English
topic R Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
Siti Romahani, Rahman
Md Mizanur, Rahman
Zi Sheng, Yeo
Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
description Gender role beliefs refer to individuals’ belief that men and women should shoulder their role-related behaviour. Evidence showed that patriarchal gender roles are directly associated with violence perpetration. Gender roles can be measured with the GEMS questionnaire, which was developed in English. Thus, it needs to be adapted to the local language to be used in a family violence study among married men in Sarawak, Malaysia. This study aims to translate and validate the original English version of the GEMS into the Malay language. The English version was translated forward and backward into Malay, followed by content validation by six public health and language experts. The scale was further tested for face validity among 30 people from the general population, followed by a cross-sectional study involving 200 male respondents. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) ranges from 0.83 to 1. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in three components within the scale, and confirmatory factor analysis established convergent and discriminant validity. The overall Cronbach’s alpha ranged from 0.778 to 0.921. In conclusion, the Malay version of the GEMS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring gender equitability among men in Sibu, Sarawak.
format Article
author Siti Romahani, Rahman
Md Mizanur, Rahman
Zi Sheng, Yeo
author_facet Siti Romahani, Rahman
Md Mizanur, Rahman
Zi Sheng, Yeo
author_sort Siti Romahani, Rahman
title Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
title_short Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
title_full Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
title_fullStr Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
title_sort reliability and validation of the malay version of the gender equitable men scale questionnaire
publisher Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya
publishDate 2024
url http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/2/Realiability.pdf
http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/44228/
https://jummec.um.edu.my/index.php/jummec/article/view/39589
https://doi.org/10.22452/jummec.vol27no1.13
_version_ 1789430377650061312
score 13.211869